ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2009
Gene expression profiling of neurochemically defined regions of the human brain by in situ hybridization-guided laser capture microdissection.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of mir-9 Expression Pattern in Rat Retina during Postnatal Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Developmental Programming: Contribution of Epigenetic Enzymes to Antral Follicular Defects in the Sheep Model of PCOS.Endocrinology · 2019Article
- Mapping Molecular Datasets Back to the Brain Regions They are Extracted from: Remembering the Native Countries of Hypothalamic Expatriates and Refugees.Advances in neurobiology · 2018Article
- Optimal vitamin D spurs serotonin: 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D represses serotonin reuptake transport (Genes & nutrition · 2018Article
- Evidence for alterations of the glial syncytial function in major depressive disorder.Journal of psychiatric research · 2016Article
- Models for preclinical studies in aging-related disorders: One is not for all.Translational medicine @ UniSa · 2015Article
- Approaches for targeted proteomics and its potential applications in neuroscience.Journal of biosciences · 2015Review
- Article
- Evidence for transcriptional factor dysregulation in the dorsal raphe nucleus of patients with major depressive disorder.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2012Article
- Altered expression of glutamate signaling, growth factor, and glia genes in the locus coeruleus of patients with major depression.Molecular psychiatry · 2011Article
- Brain expression quantitative trait locus mapping informs genetic studies of psychiatric diseases.Neuroscience bulletin · 2011Review
- A quantitative comparison of cell-type-specific microarray gene expression profiling methods in the mouse brain.PloS one · 2011Article
- Region-specific in situ hybridization-guided laser-capture microdissection on postmortem human brain tissue coupled with gene expression quantification.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2011Article
- Expectations, validity, and reality in gene expression profiling.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2010Review
- Medicine. The future of psychiatric research: genomes and neural circuits.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2010Article
- Four decades of neurodegenerative disease research: how far we have come!The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Laser capture microdissection (LCM) permits isolation of specific cell types and cell groups based upon morphology, anatomical landmarks and histochemical properties. This powerful technique can be used for region-specific dissection if the target structure is clearly delineated. However, it is difficult to visualize anatomical boundaries in an unstained specimen, while histological staining can complicate the microdissection process and compromise downstream processing and analysis. We now introduce a novel method in which in situ hybridization (ISH) signal is used to guide LCM on adjacent unstained sections to collect tissue from neurochemically defined regions of the human postmortem brain to minimize sample manipulation prior to analysis. This approach was validated in nuclei that provide monoaminergic inputs to the forebrain, and likely contribute to the pathophysiology of mood disorders. This method was used successfully to carry out gene expression profiling and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) confirmation from the dissected material. When compared to traditional micropunch dissections, our ISH-guided LCM method provided enhanced signal intensity for mRNAs of specific monoaminergic marker genes as measured by genome-wide gene expression microarrays. Enriched expression of specific monoaminergic genes (as determined by microarrays and qPCR) was detected within appropriate anatomical locations validating the accuracy of microdissection. Together these results support the conclusion that ISH-guided LCM permits acquisition of enriched nucleus-specific RNA that can be successfully used for downstream gene expression investigations. Future studies will utilize this approach for gene expression profiling of neurochemically defined regions of postmortem brains collected from mood disorder patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.