Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19070632›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2009

Gene expression profiling of neurochemically defined regions of the human brain by in situ hybridization-guided laser capture microdissection.

René Bernard, Ilan A Kerman, Fan Meng, Simon J Evans, Irmgard Amrein, Edward G Jones, William E Bunney, Huda Akil, Stanley J Watson, Robert C Thompson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Four decades of neurodegenerative disease research: how far we have come!The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

René BernardMolecular & Behavioral Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. rene.bernard@charite.de
Ilan A Kerman
Fan Meng
Simon J Evans
Irmgard Amrein
Edward G Jones
William E Bunney
Huda Akil
Stanley J Watson
Robert C Thompson
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

Project 5: High-Throughput Analysis of Gene RegulationP50MH060398 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI BUNNEY, WILLIAM E · 1999 to 2008
$12.7M
FOREBRAIN OVEREXPRESSION OF A STRESS-RELATED GENEP01DA021633 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI AKIL, HUDA · 2007 to 2011
$6.2M
Neural Substrates of Somatomotor and Autonomic Disturbances in Major DepressionK99MH081927 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KERMAN, ILAN A · 2008 to 2009
$174k
NIDA NIH HHS P01 DA021633NIMH NIH HHS 1K99MH081927-01A1NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH081927NIMH NIH HHS L99MH60398NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH060398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laser capture microdissection (LCM) permits isolation of specific cell types and cell groups based upon morphology, anatomical landmarks and histochemical properties. This powerful technique can be used for region-specific dissection if the target structure is clearly delineated. However, it is difficult to visualize anatomical boundaries in an unstained specimen, while histological staining can complicate the microdissection process and compromise downstream processing and analysis. We now introduce a novel method in which in situ hybridization (ISH) signal is used to guide LCM on adjacent unstained sections to collect tissue from neurochemically defined regions of the human postmortem brain to minimize sample manipulation prior to analysis. This approach was validated in nuclei that provide monoaminergic inputs to the forebrain, and likely contribute to the pathophysiology of mood disorders. This method was used successfully to carry out gene expression profiling and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) confirmation from the dissected material. When compared to traditional micropunch dissections, our ISH-guided LCM method provided enhanced signal intensity for mRNAs of specific monoaminergic marker genes as measured by genome-wide gene expression microarrays. Enriched expression of specific monoaminergic genes (as determined by microarrays and qPCR) was detected within appropriate anatomical locations validating the accuracy of microdissection. Together these results support the conclusion that ISH-guided LCM permits acquisition of enriched nucleus-specific RNA that can be successfully used for downstream gene expression investigations. Future studies will utilize this approach for gene expression profiling of neurochemically defined regions of postmortem brains collected from mood disorder patients.

Indexed as

LasersAdolescentAdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceBrainCell NucleusFemaleGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingHumansIn Situ HybridizationMaleMicroarray AnalysisMicrodissectionMiddle AgedNerve Tissue ProteinsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID19070632
PMCPMC2637935
OpenAlexW2099875375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.