Trial reportClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2008
A multicentre phase II study to evaluate sequential docetaxel followed by capecitabine treatment in anthracycline-pretreated HER-2-negative patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Trial report in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTreatment of HER-2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients after anthracycline exposure is controversial. Docetaxel/capecitabine is a promising regimen, but the administration schedule is not well established. MATERIALS AND
methodsTreatment included 3 cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m2 day 1 every 21 days followed by 3 cycles of capecitabine 1250 mg/m2/12 h days 1-14. Patients not progressing were maintained with capecitabine 900 mg/m2/12 h on days 1-14 every 21 days until progression or unacceptable toxicity.
resultsFifty-three anthracycline-pretreated patients were enrolled: median age 54 years, ECOG grade 0-1 86.7%. Most of the women received adjuvant chemotherapy (81%) and 5 patients (9%) had had prior metastatic chemotherapy treatment. Median time from anthracycline exposure was 29 months. ORR (intent-to-treatment analysis) after the sequential therapy was 51% (CI 95% 37-65) with 15% (CI 95% 7-28) of patients reaching complete responses. Median time to progression was 8.2 (CI 95% 7.1-10.7) months, with 61.9% (CI 95% 45.6-76.4) of the patients free of disease after 6 months. Median overall survival was not reached after a median follow-up of 10.4 months, and 75% of the patients were alive after 14.3 months. Survival rate after 12 months was 81.1% (CI 95% 68.0-90.6). The most frequent NCI grade 3-4 toxicities were hair loss (28.3%), asthenia (15.1%), stomatitis (11.32%) and nausea (11.32%). Severe hand-foot syndrome rate was 7.5%.
conclusionsSequential docetaxel-capecitabine is feasible, effective and well tolerated in first-line MBC treatment. Evaluation of this schedule in randomised studies is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.