Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19067748›Full record

ReviewFEMS microbiology reviews2009

Toward minimal bacterial cells: evolution vs. design.

Andrés Moya, Rosario Gil, Amparo Latorre, Juli Peretó, Maria Pilar Garcillán-Barcia, Fernando de la Cruz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEMS microbiology reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Determination of the genome-scale metabolic network ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Metabolic Profile of the Genome-ReducedACS synthetic biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Insights intoProteomes · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genome-driven cell engineering review:Essays in biochemistry · 2019
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrés MoyaInstitut Cavanilles de Biodiversitat i Biologia Evolutiva, Universitat de València, València, Spain. andres.moya@uv.es
Rosario Gil
Amparo Latorre
Juli Peretó
Maria Pilar Garcillán-Barcia
Fernando de la Cruz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent technical and conceptual advances in the biological sciences opened the possibility of the construction of newly designed cells. In this paper we review the state of the art of cell engineering in the context of genome research, paying particular attention to what we can learn on naturally reduced genomes from either symbiotic or free living bacteria. Different minimal hypothetically viable cells can be defined on the basis of several computational and experimental approaches. Projects aiming at simplifying living cells converge with efforts to make synthetic genomes for minimal cells. The panorama of this particular view of synthetic biology lead us to consider the use of defined minimal cells to be applied in biomedical, bioremediation, or bioenergy application by taking advantage of existing naturally minimized cells.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyEvolution, MolecularGenes, SyntheticBacteriaEvolution, ChemicalGenome, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID19067748
PMCPMC7189813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.