Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2009
A culturally tailored navigator program for colorectal cancer screening in a community health center: a randomized, controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 202 papers, 21 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates by Lowering Barriers in Low Income and Non-English Speaking Populations: The Chelsea Colorectal Cancer Screening Project
Patient Navigation and Financial Incentives to Promote Smoking Cessation
Improving Comprehensive Cancer Screening Among Vulnerable Patients Using Patient Navigation as Part of a Population-Based Health IT System: A Randomized Control Trial
Assessing the Effect of Virtual Navigation Interventions to Improve Health Insurance Literacy and Decrease Financial Burden: A Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Randomized Trial (HINTII)
Who cites it
202 citing papers in PubMed, 21 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 338 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cancer screening uptake among refugees in high and middle-income countries: a systematic review.Preventive medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Components and effectiveness of patient navigation programmes to increase participation to breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review.Cancer medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Effect of interventions for non-emergent medical transportation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2022Pooled it
- Community Health Workers as Healthcare Navigators in Primary Care Chronic Disease Management: a Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Interventions to Increase Stool Blood Colorectal Cancer Screening in African Americans.Journal of community health · 2021Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Patient Navigation to Increase Cancer Screening in Populations Adversely Affected by Health Disparities: a Meta-analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2020Pooled it
- The Case for Patient Navigation in Lung Cancer Screening in Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review.Population health management · 2019Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Interventions to Minimize Transportation Barriers Among People with Chronic Diseases.Journal of community health · 2019Pooled it
- Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA internal medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Interventions Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Latino Men: A Systematic Review.Preventing chronic disease · 2018Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Characteristics of Effective Colorectal Cancer Screening Navigation Programs in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Systematic Review.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2017Pooled it
- Using digital notifications to improve attendance in clinic: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2016Pooled it
- Navigating Language Barriers: A Systematic Review of Patient Navigators' Impact on Cancer Screening for Limited English Proficient Patients.Journal of general internal medicine · 2016Pooled it
- Effects of Community-Based Health Worker Interventions to Improve Chronic Disease Management and Care Among Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review.American journal of public health · 2016Pooled it
- A systematic review on US-based community health navigator (CHN) interventions for cancer screening promotion--comparing community- versus clinic-based navigator models.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2015Pooled it
- Characterization of the Hispanic or latino population in health research: a systematic review.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2014Pooled it
- Interventions to improve care related to colorectal cancer among racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2012Pooled it
- What implementation interventions increase cancer screening rates? a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2011Pooled it
- Effective interventions to facilitate the uptake of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening: an implementation guideline.Implementation science : IS · 2011Pooled it
142 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMinority racial/ethnic groups have low colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates.
objectiveTo evaluate a culturally tailored intervention to increase CRC screening, primarily using colonoscopy, among low income and non-English speaking patients.
designRandomized controlled trial conducted from January to October of 2007.
settingSingle, urban community health center serving a low-income, ethnically diverse population. PATIENTS: A total of 1,223 patients 52-79 years of age overdue for CRC screening, randomized to intervention (n = 409) vs. usual care control (n = 814) groups.
interventionIntervention patients received an introductory letter with educational material followed by phone or in-person contact by a language-concordant "navigator." Navigators (n = 5) were community health workers trained to identify and address patient-reported barriers to CRC screening. Individually tailored interventions included patient education, procedure scheduling, translation and explanation of bowel preparation, and help with transportation and insurance coverage. Rates of colorectal cancer screening were assessed for intervention and usual care control patients.
resultsOver a 9-month period, intervention patients were more likely to undergo CRC screening than control patients (27% vs. 12% for any CRC screening, p < 0.001; 21% vs. 10% for colonoscopy completion, p < 0.001). The higher screening rate resulted in the identification of 10.5 polyps per 100 patients in the intervention group vs. 6.8 in the control group (p = 0.04). LIMITATIONS: Patients were from one health center. Some patients may have obtained CRC screening outside our system.
conclusionsA culturally tailored, language-concordant navigator program designed to identify and overcome barriers to colorectal cancer screening can significantly improve colonoscopy rates for low income, ethnically and linguistically diverse patients. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00476970.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.