Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19066607›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2009

Paclitaxel and carboplatin vs gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with adeno- or undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary: a randomised prospective phase II trial.

G Huebner, H Link, C H Kohne, M Stahl, A Kretzschmar, S Steinbach, G Folprecht, H Bernhard, S E Al-Batran, P Schoffski and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SEOM-GECOD clinical guideline for cancer of unknown primary (update 2025).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. SEOM-GECOD clinical guideline for unknown primary cancer (2021).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Cancer of Unknown Primary Presenting with Chylothorax.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Epidemiologic, histopathological, and prognostic analysis of cancer of unknown primary in an Iranian population.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Synergic activity of FGFR2 and MEK inhibitors in the treatment of FGFR2-amplified cancers of unknown primary.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. [Cancer of unknown primary-The new ESMO guidelines].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

G HuebnerWestpfalz-Klinikum, Hellmut-Hartert-Str 1, 67655 Kaiserslautern, Germany. lghuebner@web.de
H Link
C H Kohne
M Stahl
A Kretzschmar
S Steinbach
G Folprecht
H Bernhard
S E Al-Batran
P Schoffski
C Burkart
F Kullmann
B Otremba
M Menges
M Hoffmann
U Kaiser
A Aldaoud
A Jahn
German CUP Study Group
Westpfalz Klinikum · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEKliniken Essen-Mitte · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DESt. Bernward Krankenhaus · DETUM Klinikum · DEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DEKlinikum Ludwigshafen · DESaarland University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Platinum/taxane combinations are widely used in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP), yielding response rates of 30% and median overall survival of 9-11 months in selected patients. Yet these combinations have not been subject to a randomised trial to overcome selection bias, a major problem in CUP. We randomised 92 patients to either paclitaxel/carboplatin (arm A) or the non-platinum non-taxane regimen gemcitabine/vinorelbine (arm B). The primary endpoint was rate of practicability as defined: application of >or=2 cycles of therapy (1) with a maximal delay of 1 week (2) and survival of >or=8 months (3). Practicability was shown in 52.4% (95% CI 36-68%) in arm A and in 42.2% (95% CI 28-58%) in arm B, respectively. The median overall survival, 1-year survival -rate and response rate of patients treated in arm A was 11.0 months, 38, and 23.8%, arm B 7.0 months, 29, and 20%. In conclusion, the paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen showed clinically meaningful activity in this randomised trial (Clinical trial registration number 219, 'Deutsches KrebsStudienRegister', German Cancer Society.)

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinDeoxycytidineErbB ReceptorsFemaleGemcitabineHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Unknown PrimaryPaclitaxelProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesVinblastineCarboplatinDeoxycytidineErbB ReceptorsGemcitabinePaclitaxelVinblastineVinorelbine

Identifiers

PMID19066607
PMCPMC2634671
OpenAlexW1997274616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.