ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2008
Visualization of protein interactions in living cells.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering a new tripartite split-ccGFP system from Corynactis californica for detecting protein-protein interactions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- In vivo quantitative FRET small animal imaging: Intensity versus lifetime-based FRET.Biophysical reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Enhancement of probe signal for screening of HIV-1 protease inhibitors in living cells.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2012Article
- Genetically encodable fluorescent biosensors for tracking signaling dynamics in living cells.Chemical reviews · 2011Review
- Molecular characterization of the AdeI mutant of Chinese hamster ovary cells: a cellular model of adenylosuccinate lyase deficiency.Molecular genetics and metabolism · 2011Article
- CARD9 facilitates microbe-elicited production of reactive oxygen species by regulating the LyGDI-Rac1 complex.Nature immunology · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Ligand binding to cell membrane receptors sets off a series of protein interactions that convey the nuances ofligand identity to the cell interior. The information may be encoded in conformational changes, the interaction kinetics and, in the case of multichain immunoreceptors, by chain rearrangements. The signals may be modulated by dynamic compartmentalization of the cell membrane, cellular architecture, motility, and activation--all of which are difficult to reconstitute for studies of receptor signaling in vitro. In this chapter, we will discuss how protein interactions in general and receptor signaling in particular can be studied in living cells by different fluorescence imaging techniques. Particularly versatile are methods that exploit Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET), which is exquisitely sensitive to the nanometer-range proximity and orientation between fluorophores. Fluorescence correlation microscopy (FCM) can provide complementary information about the stoichiometry and diffusion kinetics of large complexes, while bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) and other complementation techniques can capture transient interactions. A continuing challenge is extracting from the imaging data the quantitative information that is necessary to verify different models of signal transduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.