ArticleNature clinical practice. Cardiovascular medicine2009
Impact of optimal medical therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention on patients with stable angina.
Article in Nature clinical practice. Cardiovascular medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not associated with reduction in risk of death or myocardial infarction in patients who have chronic stable angina with normal left ventricular function and moderate coronary artery disease. A substudy of the COURAGE trial has shown that both PCI plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) and OMT alone result in marked improvements in quality of life and angina, but that PCI can substantially benefit patients with more-severe and more-frequent angina. A number of caveats to this study exist, including the extent to which the findings can be applied to the general patient population and the large proportion of patients who had mild angina or were asymptomatic--it is difficult to make these patients feel better. In addition, the remarkable commitment of both healthcare providers and patients in this study would be hard to achieve in clinical practice. Nevertheless, for patients with mild or no angina and no significant ischemia on stress testing, the COURAGE trial reassures us that OMT alone can be efficacious in reducing angina and/or improving quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19065124What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.