ArticleInfection and immunity2009
Regulatory T cells modulate staphylococcal enterotoxin B-induced effector T-cell activation and acceleration of colitis.
Article in Infection and immunity, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- IL-35 is critical in suppressing superantigenic Staphylococcus aureus-driven inflammatory Th17 responses in human nasopharynx-associated lymphoid tissue.Mucosal immunology · 2020Article
- Staphylococcal enterotoxin B administration in pregnant rats alters the splenic lymphocyte response in adult offspring rats.BMC microbiology · 2017Article
- Staphylococcal Enterotoxin B (SEB) Induces Memory CD4 T Cell AnergyJournal of clinical & cellular immunology · 2015Article
- Murine immune response to a chronic Staphylococcus aureus biofilm infection.Infection and immunity · 2011Article
- Review
- Concurrent exposure to microbial products and food antigens triggers initiation of food allergy.North American journal of medical sciences · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral administration of bacterial superantigen Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin B (SEB) activates mucosal T cells but does not cause mucosal inflammation. We examined the effect of oral SEB on the development of mucosal inflammation in mice in the absence of regulatory T (Treg) cells. SCID mice were fed SEB 3 and 7 days after reconstitution with CD4(+) CD45RB(high) or CD4(+) CD45RB(high) plus CD4(+) CD45RB(low) T cells. Mice were sacrificed at different time points to examine changes in tissue damage and in T-cell phenotypes. Feeding SEB failed to produce any clinical effect on SCID mice reconstituted with CD4(+) CD45RB(high) and CD4(+) CD45RB(low) T cells, but feeding SEB accelerated the development of colitis in SCID mice reconstituted with CD4(+) CD45RB(high) T cells alone. The latter was associated with an increase in the number of CD4(+) Vbeta8(+) T cells expressing CD69 and a significantly lower number of CD4(+) CD25(+) Foxp3(+) T cells. These changes were not observed in SCID mice reconstituted with both CD45RB(high) and CD45RB(low) T cells. In addition, SEB impaired the development of Treg cells in the SCID mice reconstituted with CD4(+) CD45RB(high) T cells alone but had no direct effect on Treg cells. In the absence of Treg cells, feeding SEB induced activation of mucosal T cells and accelerated the development of colitis. This suggests that Treg cells prevent SEB-induced mucosal inflammation through modulation of SEB-induced T-cell activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.