Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19064635›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2009

Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of prime-boost regimens with recombinant (delta)ureC hly+ Mycobacterium bovis BCG and modified vaccinia virus ankara expressing M. tuberculosis antigen 85A against murine tuberculosis.

Elma Z Tchilian, Christiane Desel, Emily K Forbes, Silke Bandermann, Clare R Sander, Adrian V S Hill, Helen McShane, Stefan H E Kaufmann

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. BCGΔBCG1419c increased memory CD8Scientific reports · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Immunization withJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Polyfunctional CD4Frontiers in immunology · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. NPJ vaccines · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elma Z TchilianThe Jenner Institute, Oxford University, ORCRB, Roosevelt Drive, Headington, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom. elma.tchilian@ndm.ox.ac.uk
Christiane Desel
Emily K Forbes
Silke Bandermann
Clare R Sander
Adrian V S Hill
Helen McShane
Stefan H E Kaufmann
Max Planck Society · DEUniversity of Oxford · GBJenner Institute · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1100085Wellcome Trust 076943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the light of the recent emergence of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the epidemic of tuberculosis (TB) in populations coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus, and the failure of Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) to protect against disease, new vaccines against TB are urgently needed. Two promising new vaccine candidates are the recombinant DeltaureC hly(+) BCG (recBCG), which has been developed to replace the current BCG vaccine strain, and modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) expressing M. tuberculosis antigen 85A (MVA85A), which is a leading candidate vaccine designed to boost the protective efficacy of BCG. In the present study, we examined the effect of MVA85A boosting on the protection afforded at 12 weeks postchallenge by BCG and recBCG by using bacterial CFU as an efficacy readout. recBCG-immunized mice were significantly better protected against aerosol challenge with M. tuberculosis than mice immunized with the parental strain of BCG. Intradermal boosting with MVA85A did not reduce the bacterial burden any further. In order to identify a marker for the development of a protective immune response against M. tuberculosis challenge, we analyzed splenocytes after priming or prime-boosting by using intracytoplasmic cytokine staining and assays for cytokine secretion. Boosting with MVA85A, but not priming with BCG or recBCG, greatly increased the antigen 85A-specific T-cell response, suggesting that the mechanism of protection may differ from that against BCG or recBCG. We show that the numbers of systemic multifunctional cytokine-producing cells did not correlate with protection against aerosol challenge in BALB/c mice. This emphasizes the need for new biomarkers for the evaluation of TB vaccine efficacy.

Indexed as

AcyltransferasesAnimalsAntigens, BacterialBCG VaccineCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesFemaleGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenetic EngineeringImmunization, SecondaryMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMycobacterium bovisRecombinant ProteinsTuberculin TestTuberculosis, PulmonaryVaccinia virusAcyltransferasesantigen 85A, Mycobacterium tuberculosisAntigens, BacterialBCG VaccineRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19064635
PMCPMC2632018
OpenAlexW2129607075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.