Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19064615›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2009

The effect of a prepulse stimulus on the EMG rebound following the cutaneous silent period.

H Kumru, E Opisso, J Valls-Solé, M Kofler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Autonomic and neuropathic complaints of long-COVID objectified: an investigation from electrophysiological perspective.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Modulation of the excitatory phase following the cutaneous silent period by vibration.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Focus on the pedunculopontine nucleus. Consensus review from the May 2018 brainstem society meeting in Washington, DC, USA.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2019
    Review
  6. Effects of vibration on cutaneous silent period.Experimental brain research · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluation of startle response and prepulse inhibition based on changes in the range of vertical pressure force of the feet on the ground: a preliminary study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cutaneous silent period in human FDI motor units.Experimental brain research · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

H KumruDepartment of Neurology, Instituto Guttmann, Hospital de Neurorehabilitació, Camí de Can Ruti S/N, Badalona, Spain.
E Opisso
J Valls-Solé
M Kofler

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cutaneous silent period (CSP) is a spinal inhibitory reflex mediated by Adelta fibres. The postinhibitory rebound of electromyographic (EMG) activity following the CSP has been mainly attributed to resynchronization of motoneurons, but the possibility of startle reflex activity contributing to the EMG burst has also been suggested. Several types of reflexes may be suppressed by a preceding weak stimulus--a phenomenon called prepulse inhibition (PPI). Our aim was to study whether PPI would diminish the EMG rebound, thereby providing further evidence for excitatory reflex activity contained within the postinhibitory EMG rebound following the CSP. Ten healthy subjects underwent CSP testing following noxious digit II stimulation in two conditions, with and without a prepulse applied to digit III. Rectified surface EMG recordings were obtained from right orbicularis oculi, sternocleidomastoid and thenar muscles of the dominant hand during thumb abduction with 25% of maximum force. The area of the EMG rebound and the EMG reflex responses in orbicularis oculi and sternocleidomastoid were significantly smaller in recordings where a prepulse stimulus was applied 100 ms before the stimulus as compared to control responses without prepulse. CSP onset and end latency, CSP duration, and the degree of EMG suppression were not influenced. Prepulses significantly reduced subjective discomfort as based on visual analog scale scores. Inhibition of the EMG rebound by prepulse stimulation supports the hypothesis that the excitatory EMG activity following the CSP contains not only resynchronization of motoneuronal firing, but also an excitatory reflex component. The most probable type of reflex seems to be a somatosensory startle reflex, a defence reaction which is generated in structures located in the caudal brainstem following an unexpected intense stimulus. Reduction of the discomfort associated with high-intensity electrical fingertip stimulation by a prepulse without affecting CSP parameters underlines the utility of PPI in the context of CSP testing.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, MotorAdultBlinkingElectric StimulationElectromyographyEyelidsFemaleHandHumansMaleMotor NeuronsMuscle, SkeletalNeck MusclesNeural InhibitionReaction TimeReflex, Abnormal

Identifiers

PMID19064615
PMCPMC2670082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.