ArticlePharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior2009
Relative potency of the opioid antagonists naloxone and 6-alpha-naloxol to precipitate withdrawal from acute morphine dependence varies with time post-antagonist.
Article in Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Withdrawal-Induced Delirium in Opioid Dependence: A Systematic Review.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Review
- The role of opioid antagonist efficacy and constitutive opioid receptor activity in the opioid withdrawal syndrome in mice.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The current study compared the potency of naloxone versus 6-alpha-naloxol to precipitate opioid withdrawal under varying conditions of morphine pretreatment history using suppression of operant responding for food reward as the index of withdrawal. Male Wistar rats trained to respond on a lever for food reward received pretreatment with either Vehicle (Morphine-Naïve), a single subcutaneous (SC) injection of 5.6 mg/kg morphine (Single Morphine), or two morphine injections at 24 h intervals (Repeat Morphine), with varying doses of naloxone or 6-alpha-naloxol injected SC 4 h post-morphine and 5 min prior to the 30 min test session. When responding over the entire 30 min operant session was examined, naloxone was only 5-fold more potent than 6-alpha-naloxol in suppressing operant responding under Morphine Naïve conditions, but this increased to a 65-fold potency difference after Single or Repeat Morphine pretreatment. Examination of the relative potency of these antagonists in the Early Phase of operant testing (5-15 min post-antagonist) revealed an even greater 100-fold potency difference between naloxone and 6-alpha-naloxol, but in the Late Phase of testing (25-35 min post-antagonist), this had declined to a 9-fold potency difference, comparable to the relative potency of naloxone to 6-alpha-naloxol under Morphine-Naïve conditions. The results confirm a differential potency of naloxone to its reduced conjugate 6-alpha-naloxol in vivo, and extend the observation of this phenomenon to an acute (single) pretreatment with a low dose of morphine and an additional sign of opioid withdrawal to those previously used. However, the results also indicate that delay in onset of action of 6-alpha-naloxol at opioid receptors in the central nervous system may contribute significantly to its reduced potency relative to naloxone under certain morphine pretreatment conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.