SynthesisBMC genomics2008
A cross-species transcriptomics approach to identify genes involved in leaf development.
Synthesis in BMC genomics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interplay among ZF-HD and GRF transcription factors during Arabidopsis leaf development.Plant physiology · 2023Pooled it
- Rice Zinc-Finger Homeodomain 1 (OsZHD1) Finetunes Flowering Time by Modulating the Photoperiodic Response.Plant, cell & environment · 2025Article
- Zinc Finger-Homeodomain Transcriptional Factors (ZHDs) in Cucumber (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- The Developmental Delay of Seedlings With Cotyledons Only Confers Stress Tolerance toFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Leaf shape inEcology and evolution · 2020Article
- Expression Pattern Similarities Support the Prediction of Orthologs Retaining Common Functions after Gene Duplication Events.Plant physiology · 2016Article
- Biotechnology Towards Energy Crops.Molecular biotechnology · 2016Article
- Genetical genomics of Populus leaf shape variation.BMC plant biology · 2015Article
- Article
- Article
- ComPlEx: conservation and divergence of co-expression networks in A. thaliana, Populus and O. sativa.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Comparative network analysis reveals that tissue specificity and gene function are important factors influencing the mode of expression evolution in Arabidopsis and rice.Plant physiology · 2011Article
- A systems biology model of the regulatory network in Populus leaves reveals interacting regulators and conserved regulation.BMC plant biology · 2011Article
- Comparative transcriptomics of drought responses in Populus: a meta-analysis of genome-wide expression profiling in mature leaves and root apices across two genotypes.BMC genomics · 2010Article
- Robin: an intuitive wizard application for R-based expression microarray quality assessment and analysis.Plant physiology · 2010Article
- PlnTFDB: updated content and new features of the plant transcription factor database.Nucleic acids research · 2010Article
- Storage products and transcriptional analysis of the endosperm of cultivated wheat and two wild wheat species.Journal of applied genetics · 2010Article
- Oncoviruses and Pathogenic MicroRNAs in Humans.The open virology journal · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe have made use of publicly available gene expression data to identify transcription factors and transcriptional modules (regulons) associated with leaf development in Populus. Different tissue types were compared to identify genes informative in the discrimination of leaf and non-leaf tissues. Transcriptional modules within this set of genes were identified in a much wider set of microarray data collected from leaves in a number of developmental, biotic, abiotic and transgenic experiments.
resultsTranscription factors that were over represented in leaf EST libraries and that were useful for discriminating leaves from other tissues were identified, revealing that the C2C2-YABBY, CCAAT-HAP3 and 5, MYB, and ZF-HD families are particularly important in leaves. The expression of transcriptional modules and transcription factors was examined across a number of experiments to select those that were particularly active during the early stages of leaf development. Two transcription factors were found to collocate to previously published Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) for leaf length. We also found that miRNA family 396 may be important in the control of leaf development, with three members of the family collocating with clusters of leaf development QTL.
conclusionThis work provides a set of candidate genes involved in the control and processes of leaf development. This resource can be used for a wide variety of purposes such as informing the selection of candidate genes for association mapping or for the selection of targets for reverse genetics studies to further understanding of the genetic control of leaf size and shape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.