Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19061501›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2008

Systematic identification of yeast cell cycle transcription factors using multiple data sources.

Wei-Sheng Wu, Wen-Hsiung Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. YPIBP: A repository for phosphoinositide-binding proteins in yeast.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. YGMD: a repository for yeast cooperative transcription factor sets and their target gene modules.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. CoopTFD: a repository for predicted yeast cooperative transcription factor pairs.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Wei-Sheng WuDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. wessonwu@gmail.com
Wen-Hsiung Li
University of Chicago · US

Funding

STATISTICAL STUDIES OF DNA EVOLUTIONR37GM030998 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI LI, WEN-HSIUNG · 2000 to 2009
$1.9M
Cis-regulatory motif variants and evolution of gene regulation in yeastsR01GM081724 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI LI, WEN-HSIUNG · 2007 to 2009
$623k
STATISTICAL STUDIES OF DNA EVOLUTIONR01GM030998 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI LI, WEN-HSIUNG · 1985 to 1999
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM081724NIGMS NIH HHS GM30998NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM030998NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081724NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM030998
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEukaryotic cell cycle is a complex process and is precisely regulated at many levels. Many genes specific to the cell cycle are regulated transcriptionally and are expressed just before they are needed. To understand the cell cycle process, it is important to identify the cell cycle transcription factors (TFs) that regulate the expression of cell cycle-regulated genes.

resultsWe developed a method to identify cell cycle TFs in yeast by integrating current ChIP-chip, mutant, transcription factor binding site (TFBS), and cell cycle gene expression data. We identified 17 cell cycle TFs, 12 of which are known cell cycle TFs, while the remaining five (Ash1, Rlm1, Ste12, Stp1, Tec1) are putative novel cell cycle TFs. For each cell cycle TF, we assigned specific cell cycle phases in which the TF functions and identified the time lag for the TF to exert regulatory effects on its target genes. We also identified 178 novel cell cycle-regulated genes, among which 59 have unknown functions, but they may now be annotated as cell cycle-regulated genes. Most of our predictions are supported by previous experimental or computational studies. Furthermore, a high confidence TF-gene regulatory matrix is derived as a byproduct of our method. Each TF-gene regulatory relationship in this matrix is supported by at least three data sources: gene expression, TFBS, and ChIP-chip or/and mutant data. We show that our method performs better than four existing methods for identifying yeast cell cycle TFs. Finally, an application of our method to different cell cycle gene expression datasets suggests that our method is robust.

conclusionOur method is effective for identifying yeast cell cycle TFs and cell cycle-regulated genes. Many of our predictions are validated by the literature. Our study shows that integrating multiple data sources is a powerful approach to studying complex biological systems.

Indexed as

Cell CycleComputational BiologyGene Expression Regulation, FungalModels, GeneticOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisTranscription FactorsYeastsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID19061501
PMCPMC2613934
OpenAlexW2102055689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.