Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19059660›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of cardiology2010

Distinct vascular and metabolic effects of different classes of anti-hypertensive drugs.

Kwang Kon Koh, Michael J Quon, Seung Hwan Han, Yonghee Lee, Soo Jin Kim, Yesl Koh, Eak Kyun Shin

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of cardiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Pharmacometabolomic signature links simvastatin therapy and insulin resistance.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2017
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kwang Kon KohVascular Medicine and Atherosclerosis Unit, Cardiology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University, Incheon, Republic of Korea. kwangk@gilhospital.com
Michael J Quon
Seung Hwan Han
Yonghee Lee
Soo Jin Kim
Yesl Koh
Eak Kyun Shin
Gachon University Gil Medical Center · KRNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of Seoul · KR

Funding

Insulin Stimulated Production Of Nitric Oxide In Vascular EndotheliumZIAAT000001 · NCCIH · NATIONAL CENTER FOR COMPLEMENTARY & INTEGRATIVE HEALTH · PI QUON, MICHAEL J. · 2009 to 2010
$2.9M
Insulin Stimulated Production Of Nitric Oxide In Vascular EndotheliumZ01AT000001 · NCCIH · NATIONAL CENTER FOR COMPLEMENTARY & INTEGRATIVE HEALTH · PI QUON, MICHAEL J. · 2002 to 2008
$2.4M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 AT000001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundASCOT-BPLA study demonstrates that in hypertensive subjects, atenolol+bendroflumethiazide therapy is associated with higher incidence of adverse cardiovascular outcomes and developing diabetes than an amlodipine+perindopril regimen. This is not explained by changes in blood pressure alone. We hypothesized that distinct vascular and metabolic effects of anti-hypertensive drugs may explain these differential effects.

methodsEither placebo or one class of anti-hypertensive drug (atenolol 100 mg, amlodipine 10 mg, hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg, ramipril 10 mg, or candesartan 16 mg) was given daily during 8 weeks to 31 patients in each of 6 arms of a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study.

resultsAtenolol, amlodipine, and candesartan therapies significantly reduced systolic blood pressure when compared with ramipril (P<0.05 by ANOVA). Atenolol and thiazide therapies increased triglycerides levels greater than ramipril or candesartan (P=0.005 by ANOVA). Amlodipine significantly increased HDL cholesterol levels greater than atenolol (P=0.011 by ANOVA). Ramipril and candesartan therapies improved FMD and increased adiponectin levels and insulin sensitivity to a greater extent than atenolol or thiazide therapies (P<0.001 and P<0.015 by ANOVA). Amlodipine therapy increased adiponectin levels greater than atenolol therapy (P<0.05 by ANOVA). Ramipril, candesartan, and amlodipine therapies significantly decreased leptin levels to a greater extent when compared with atenolol or thiazide therapies (P<0.001 by ANOVA). Amlodipine therapies significantly decreased resistin levels greater than ramipril or candesartan therapies (P=0.001 by ANOVA).

conclusionsWe observed differential effects of anti-hypertensive drugs on endothelial dysfunction and plasma adipocytokines.

Indexed as

AdipokinesAdiponectinAdultAgedAmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsAtenololBenzimidazolesBiphenyl CompoundsCholesterol, HDLComorbidityEndothelium, VascularFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleAdipokinesAdiponectinAmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsAtenololBenzimidazolesBiphenyl CompoundscandesartanCholesterol, HDLRamiprilTetrazolesTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID19059660
PMCPMC2862263
OpenAlexW2038299461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.