Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19059434›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2009

Detection of the optimal neuron traces in confocal microscopy images.

Zlatko Vasilkoski, Armen Stepanyants

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A pipeline for neuron reconstruction based on spatial sliding volume filter seeding.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zlatko VasilkoskiDepartment of Physics and Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Complex Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Armen Stepanyants
Northeastern University · US

Funding

Automated reconstruction of neurites from 3D microscopy image stacksR01NS063494 · NINDS · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI STEPANYANTS, ARMEN · 2008 to 2012
$1.4M
NINDS NIH HHS NS063494NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS063494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative methods of analysis of neural circuits rely on large datasets of neurons reconstructed accurately in three dimensions (3D). Due to the complexity of neuronal arbors, large datasets of reconstructed neurons must be generated with automated algorithms. Here, we attempted to automate the process of neuron tracing from sparsely labeled 3D stacks of confocal microscopy images. Our algorithm involves two steps. In the first step, the segmented image of neurites in the stack is voxel-coded. Centers of intensity of consecutively coded wave fronts are connected into a branched structure, which represents a coarse trace of the neurites. In the second step, this trace is optimized with the modified active contour method, which tends to maximize the intensity along the trace while keeping it under tension. To assess the performance of the algorithm we used manual reconstructions of neurons and converted them into artificial stacks of intensity images. These images were traced using the developed algorithm and quantitatively compared to the corresponding manual traces. The optimal traces were on average 6.0% shorter than the manual traces. This reduction in length resulted from the smoothness of the optimal traces, which, in comparison to the manual ones, were built out of shorter segments, and, as a result, were 3.3% less tortuous. The average distance between the optimal and the manual traces was 0.14 microm, and the average distance between their corresponding branch-points was 2.2 microm, illustrating good agreement between the traces.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBrainDendritesHaplorhiniImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopy, ConfocalModels, NeurologicalPyramidal Cells

Identifiers

PMID19059434
PMCPMC2771922
OpenAlexW1985233543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.