Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19058926›Full record

Trial reportDrug and alcohol dependence2009

Effects of oral methamphetamine on cocaine use: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Marc E Mooney, David V Herin, Joy M Schmitz, Nidal Moukaddam, Charles E Green, John Grabowski

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. The effectiveness of compulsory drug treatment: A systematic review.The International journal on drug policy · 2016
    Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Open-label pilot study of lisdexamfetamine for cocaine use disorder.The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse · 2021
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marc E MooneyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA. moon0078@umn.edu
David V Herin
Joy M Schmitz
Nidal Moukaddam
Charles E Green
John Grabowski
University of Houston · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Translational MR Imaging in Cocaine Pharmacotherapy DevelopmentP50DA009262 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI NARAYANA, PONNADA A · 1994 to 2014
$26.9M
Pharmacotherapy for Cocaine DependenceR01DA016305 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI GRABOWSKI, JOHN G · 2003 to 2005
$1.7M
Lisdexamfetamine treatment for cocaine dependenceR00DA023548 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MOONEY, MARC E · 2009 to 2011
$862k
Combination Pharmacotherapy for Nicotine DependenceK01DA019446 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MOONEY, MARC E · 2006 to 2010
$583k
Dextroamphetamine Treatment for Comorbid Cocaine Dependence and ADHDK99DA023548 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI HERIN, DAVID VANCE · 2007 to 2008
$146k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA019446NIDA NIH HHS K01-DA-019446NIDA NIH HHS K01-DA-023548NIDA NIH HHS K99 DA023548NIDA NIH HHS L30 DA023817NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA009262NIDA NIH HHS P50-DA-09262NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA023548NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA016305NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA-16305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo medication is currently approved for the treatment of cocaine dependence, but several preclinical and clinical reports suggest agonist-like medications, e.g., amphetamine analogues, may be a productive strategy for medication development.

objectiveThis current proof-of-concept study sought to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of methamphetamine as a candidate treatment for cocaine dependence.

methodsA randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study served to evaluate three treatment conditions in 82 cocaine-dependent individuals: (1) placebo (0mg, 6x/day; n=27), (2) immediate release (IR) methamphetamine (5mg, 6x/day; n=30), (3) sustained release (SR) methamphetamine (30 mg first pill, 1x/day; 0mg 5x/day; n=25). The study employed a sequential, two-phase design (i.e., 4 weeks of medication and counseling followed by 4 weeks of medication/counseling plus a contingency management procedure).

resultsBoth preparation forms of methamphetamine were well-tolerated, with similar retention to placebo (0mg, 33%; 30 mg IR, 30%, 30 mg SR, 32%). Methamphetamine SR was associated with decreased sleep and increased weight loss. Medication adherence rates were high for the first dose of the day (95%), while adherence for subsequent capsules was lower. Those in the SR condition exhibited consistently lower rates of cocaine-positive urine samples (0mg, 60%; 30 mg IR, 66%; 30 mg SR, 29%), p<0.0001, and reported the greatest reduction in craving for cocaine, p<0.05.

conclusionsSR methamphetamine significantly reduced cocaine use and craving. Additional research is warranted to develop and evaluate agonist-like medications that may effectively treat cocaine dependence.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAffectBlood PressureBody WeightCentral Nervous System StimulantsCocaine-Related DisordersDelayed-Action PreparationsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMethamphetamineMiddle AgedRiboflavinCentral Nervous System StimulantsDelayed-Action PreparationsMethamphetamineRiboflavin

Identifiers

PMID19058926
PMCPMC2742691
OpenAlexW2008441751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.