Trial reportJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2008
Determinants of colorectal cancer screening in primary care.
Trial report in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing cancer screening in primary care: rationale, design, analysis plan, and recruitment results.Contemporary clinical trials · 2013Trial
- Colorectal cancer awareness and acceptance of fecal immunochemical test screening in Qassim, Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Differences in colorectal cancer awareness between screening eligible vs. ineligible Palestinians: a national cross-sectional study.European journal of public health · 2024Article
- How pharmacists would design and implement a community pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program.Preventive oncology & epidemiology · 2024Article
- Colorectal cancer and potential predictors of never screened for faecal occult blood test: a narrative review.Journal of public health research · 2021Article
- Article
- Investigating Factors Associated with FOBT Screening for Colorectal Cancer Based on the Components of Health Belief Model and Social SupportAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2017Article
- Contrasts in Practices and Perceived Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening by Nurses and Physicians Working in Primary Care Settings in Oman.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2016Article
- Patient and provider perspectives on the relationship between multiple morbidity management and disease prevention.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2015Article
- Factors Associated with Colorectal Cancer Screening among Younger African American Men: A Systematic Review.Journal of health disparities research and practice · 2015Article
- Testing Interventions to Motivate and Educate (TIME): A multi-level intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening.Preventive medicine reports · 2015Article
- Colorectal cancer screening practices in Alabama: a survey of primary care physicians.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2012Article
- Factors associated with the fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening based on health belief model structures in moderate risk individuals, Isfahan, 2011.Journal of education and health promotion · 2012Article
- Rural Residents' Perspectives on Multiple Morbidity Management and Disease Prevention.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2011Article
- The relative importance of patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening.American journal of preventive medicine · 2010Article
- Relationship of colorectal cancer awareness and knowledge with colorectal cancer screening.Colorectal cancerArticle
- Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care Settings: Attitudes and Knowledge of Nurses and Physicians.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is serious, yet a minority of US adults receive within-guideline screening exams.
methodsA random selection of patients attending clinics in 3 different settings completed a survey on CRC-related barriers, knowledge, and beliefs.
resultsParticipants with fewer barriers, better knowledge, and more positive beliefs toward screening were significantly more likely to be within screening guidelines. A physician's screening recommendation was significantly related to screening in patients < 65 years, but was not significant for older patients.
conclusionsLarge-scale studies are needed. Results can be used to develop multifaceted, tailored education programs to improve CRC screening in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.