Trial reportClinical and experimental nephrology2009
Preprandial microemulsion cyclosporine administration is effective for patients with refractory nephrotic syndrome.
Trial report in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combined cyclosporine and prednisolone therapy using cyclosporine blood concentration monitoring for adult patients with new-onset minimal change nephrotic syndrome: a single-center pilot randomized trial.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2018Trial
- Significance of combined cyclosporine-prednisolone therapy and cyclosporine blood concentration monitoring for idiopathic membranous nephropathy with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: a randomized controlled multicenter trial.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2014Trial
- Response predictors and long-term outcomes of preprandial single-daily cyclosporine in children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome.Journal of nephrology · 2025Article
- Cyclosporine A CClinical and experimental nephrology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsThe present study evaluated the clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetics of microemulsion cyclosporine A (ME-CyA) with modification from postprandial to preprandial administration in adult patients with refractory nephrotic syndrome.
methodsWe investigated 19 patients with refractory nephrotic syndrome who had been switched from the postprandial administration of ME-CyA to preprandial administration. The pharmacokinetics of ME-CyA were also evaluated before and 6 months after switching from postprandial to preprandial administration by serial measurement of the blood CyA concentration in 10 patients.
resultsThis study showed that 16 of 19 patients (84%) displayed an improvement in their clinical condition or continued to maintain remission after switching from post- to preprandial administration. In particular among 14 patients with minimal change nephrotic syndrome (MCNS) in this study, 13 patients maintained or achieved remission under preprandial ME-CyA administration. Only three of 10 patients with postprandial administration showed a peak concentration> 500 ng/ml within 1-2 h after administration, while with preprandial administration, nine of 10 patients showed this good absorption profiles. This effectiveness of preprandial administration seems to be dependent on the improved pharmacokinetics with the increase of area under the curve from 0-4 h (AUC(0-4)) and peak concentration. There were no statistical differences in the mean daily doses of ME-CyA between both administration periods. No ME-CyA-induced nephrotoxicity or other harmful events were encountered throughout the study.
conclusionThe preprandial administration of ME-CyA results in a good pharmacokinetic profile and is useful for management of refractory nephrotic syndrome in adults, particularly in patients with MCNS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.