Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19057880›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2008

Large-scale preparation of UV-inactivated SARS coronavirus virions for vaccine antigen.

Yasuko Tsunetsugu-Yokota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Rapid, dose-dependent and efficient inactivation of surface dried SARS-CoV-2 by 254 nm UV-C irradiation.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Portable Ultraviolet-C Chambers for Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2.Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. The Current Status of COVID-19 Vaccines.Frontiers in genome editing · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. SARS vaccines: where are we?Expert review of vaccines · 2009
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yasuko Tsunetsugu-YokotaDepartment of Immunology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In general, a whole virion serves as a simple vaccine antigen and often essential material for the analysis of immune responses against virus infection. However, to work with highly contagious pathogens, it is necessary to take precautions against laboratory-acquired infection. We have learned many lessons from the recent outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). In order to develop an effective vaccine and diagnostic tools, we prepared UV-inactivated SARS coronavirus on a large scale under the strict Biosafety Level 3 (BSL3) regulation. Our protocol for large-scale preparation of UV-inactivated SARS-CoV including virus expansion, titration, inactivation, and ultracentrifugation is applicable to any newly emerging virus we might encounter in the future.

Indexed as

Ultraviolet RaysAntigens, ViralHumansSevere Acute Respiratory SyndromeSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusVaccines, InactivatedViral VaccinesVirionAntigens, ViralVaccines, InactivatedViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID19057880
PMCPMC7122600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.