Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19057693›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2008

The limits of two-year bioassay exposure regimens for identifying chemical carcinogens.

James Huff, Michael F Jacobson, Devra Lee Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Aspartame and cancer - new evidence for causation.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Impact of prenatal arsenic exposure on chronic adult diseases.Systems biology in reproductive medicine · 2018
    Review
  11. Cancer Prevention and Treatment by Wholistic Nutrition.Journal of nature and science · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Improving prediction of carcinogenicity to reduce, refine, and replace the use of experimental animals.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2015
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James HuffNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Michael F Jacobson
Devra Lee Davis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChemical carcinogenesis bioassays in animals have long been recognized and accepted as valid predictors of potential cancer hazards to humans. Most rodent bioassays begin several weeks after birth and expose animals to chemicals or other substances, including workplace and environmental pollutants, for 2 years. New findings indicate the need to extend the timing and duration of exposures used in the rodent bioassay.

objectivesIn this Commentary, we propose that the sensitivity of chemical carcinogenesis bio-assays would be enhanced by exposing rodents beginning in utero and continuing for 30 months (130 weeks) or until their natural deaths at up to about 3 years. DISCUSSION: Studies of three chemicals of different structures and uses-aspartame, cadmium, and toluene-suggest that exposing experimental animals in utero and continuing exposure for 30 months or until their natural deaths increase the sensitivity of bioassays, avoid false-negative results, and strengthen the value and validity of results for regulatory agencies.

conclusionsGovernment agencies, drug companies, and the chemical industry should conduct and compare the results of 2-year bioassays of known carcinogens or chemicals for which there is equivocal evidence of carcinogenicity with longer-term studies, with and without in utero exposure. If studies longer than 2 years and/or with in utero exposure are found to better identify potential human carcinogens, then regulatory agencies should promptly revise their testing guidelines, which were established in the 1960s and early 1970s. Changing the timing and dosing of the animal bioassay would enhance protection of workers and consumers who are exposed to potentially dangerous workplace or home contaminants, pollutants, drugs, food additives, and other chemicals throughout their lives.

Indexed as

Biological AssayAnimalsCarcinogenicity TestsCarcinogensEnvironmental PollutantsCarcinogensEnvironmental Pollutantsanimal cancer testsaspartamebioassay designsbisphenol Acadmiumcarcinogenicitychemical carcinogensgenisteintoluenetoxicology

Identifiers

PMID19057693
PMCPMC2592260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.