ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2008
Role of iNO in the modulation of pulmonary vascular resistance.
Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pathophysiology of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Focus on Vascular Endothelium as a Potential Therapeutic Target.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Endothelial Function in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: From Bench to Bedside.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- New Drugs and Therapies in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Molecular Pathways in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Rationale for Use of an FDA-Cleared Delivery System for Administration of Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Review
- The Role of Gasotransmitters in Gut Peptide Actions.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) has quickly become a standard therapy for term and near-term infants with hypoxic respiratory failure and persistent pulmonary hypertension. Its effect on the lung is believed to be through the stimulation of soluble guanylyl cyclase and the increased production of cyclic guanosine 3',5'-monophosphate (cGMP). However, in addition to pulmonary vasodilation and a decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance, nitric oxide (NO) shows several additional potential beneficial effects on the lung. This article reviews NO mechanisms of action, early clinical trial of iNO and clinical aspects for the use of iNO in acute respiratory failure of the term and near-tem neonates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.