Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19056923›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of audiology2008

Cross-modal interactions of auditory and somatic inputs in the brainstem and midbrain and their imbalance in tinnitus and deafness.

S Dehmel, Y L Cui, S E Shore

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of audiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Tinnitus and Brain Stimulation.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S DehmelKresge Hearing Research Institute, 1150 West Medical Center Drive, Room 5434A, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5616, USA.
Y L Cui
S E Shore

Funding

Scientific Synergy CoreP30DC005188 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SCHACHT, JOCHEN · 2002 to 2016
$10.3M
Function of trigeminal pathways to the cochlear nucleusR01DC004825 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SHORE, SUSAN E · 2001 to 2016
$5.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC005188NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004825
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis review outlines the anatomical and functional bases of somatosensory influences on auditory processing in the normal brainstem and midbrain. It then explores how interactions between the auditory and somatosensory system are modified through deafness, and their impact on tinnitus is discussed.

methodLiterature review, tract tracing, immunohistochemistry, and in vivo electrophysiological recordings were used.

resultsSomatosensory input originates in the dorsal root ganglia and trigeminal ganglia, and is transmitted directly and indirectly through 2nd-order nuclei to the ventral cochlear nucleus, dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN), and inferior colliculus. The glutamatergic somatosensory afferents can be segregated from auditory nerve inputs by the type of vesicular glutamate transporters present in their terminals. Electrical stimulation of the somatosensory input results in a complex combination of excitation and inhibition, and alters the rate and timing of responses to acoustic stimulation. Deafness increases the spontaneous rates of those neurons that receive excitatory somatosensory input and results in a greater sensitivity of DCN neurons to trigeminal stimulation.

conclusionsAuditory-somatosensory bimodal integration is already present in 1st-order auditory nuclei. The balance of excitation and inhibition elicited by somatosensory input is altered following deafness. The increase in somatosensory influence on auditory neurons when their auditory input is diminished could be due to cross-modal reinnervation or increased synaptic strength, and may contribute to mechanisms underlying somatic tinnitus.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAfferent PathwaysAnimalsAttentionAuditory PathwaysAuditory PerceptionBrain MappingBrain StemCochlear NucleusDeafnessElectric StimulationGanglia, SpinalHumansInferior ColliculiMesencephalonNeural Inhibition

Identifiers

PMID19056923
PMCPMC2760229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.