Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19055842›Full record

ArticleBMC cell biology2008

Cell adhesion to agrin presented as a nanopatterned substrate is consistent with an interaction with the extracellular matrix and not transmembrane adhesion molecules.

Tobias Wolfram, Joachim P Spatz, Robert W Burgess

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cell biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Journal of biological chemistry · 2019
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Biomaterials in cochlear implants.GMS current topics in otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tobias WolframDepartment of New Materials and Biosystems, Max-Planck-Institute for Metals Research, University of Heidelberg, Stuttgart, Germany. wolfram@mf.mpg.de
Joachim P Spatz
Robert W Burgess

Funding

Shared Resource ManagementP30CA034196 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI William Carl Skarnes · 1985 to 2026
$61.9M
Nanomedicine development center for mechanobiologyPN2EY016586 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI DUSTIN, MICHAEL LORAN · 2005 to 2014
$23.0M
Genetics of the Neuromuscular Junction: Mechanisms and Disease ModelsR01NS054154 · NINDS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BURGESS, ROBERT W. · 2006 to 2019
$6.0M
The Genetics of the Neuromuscular Junction: Mechanisms and Disease ModelsR37NS054154 · NINDS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI Robert W. Burgess · 2020 to 2026
$5.9M
Genetics of the Neuromuscular Junction: Mechanisms and Disease ModelsR56NS054154 · NINDS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BURGESS, ROBERT W. · 2015 to 2015
$613k
NCI NIH HHS CA034196NCI NIH HHS P30 CA034196NEI NIH HHS PN2 EY 016586NEI NIH HHS PN2 EY016586NINDS NIH HHS NS054154NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS054154NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS054154NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS054154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMolecular spacing is important for cell adhesion in a number of ways, ranging from the ordered arrangement of matrix polymers extracellularly, to steric hindrance of adhesion/signaling complexes intracellularly. This has been demonstrated using nanopatterned RGD peptides, a canonical extracellular matrix ligand for integrin interactions. Cell adhesion was greatly reduced when the RGD-coated nanoparticles were separated by more than 60 nm, indicating a sharp spacing-dependent threshold for this form of cell adhesion.

resultsHere we show a similar dependence of cell adhesion on the spacing of agrin, a protein that exists as both a secreted, matrix-bound form and a type-2 transmembrane form in vivo. Agrin was presented as a substrate for cell adhesion assays by anchoring recombinant protein to gold nanoparticles that were arrayed at tunable distances onto glass coverslips. Cells adhered well to nanopatterned agrin, and when presented as uniformly coated substrates, adhesion to agrin was comparable to other well-studied adhesion molecules, including N-Cadherin. Adhesion of both mouse primary cortical neurons and rat B35 neuroblastoma cells showed a spacing-dependent threshold, with a sharp drop in adhesion when the space between agrin-coated nanoparticles increased from 60 to 90 nm. In contrast, adhesion to N-Cadherin decreased gradually over the entire range of distances tested (uniform, 30, 60, 90, and 160 nm). The spacing of the agrin nanopattern also influenced cell motility, and peptide competition suggested adhesion was partially integrin dependent. Finally, differences in cell adhesion to C-terminal agrin fragments of different lengths were detected using nanopatterned substrates, and these differences were not evident using uniformly coated substrates.

conclusionThese results suggest nanopatterned substrates may provide a physiological presentation of adhesive substrates, and are consistent with cells adhering to agrin through a mechanism that more closely resembles an interaction with the extracellular matrix than a transmembrane adhesion molecule.

Indexed as

AgrinAnimalsApoptosisCell AdhesionCell Adhesion MoleculesCell Line, TumorCell MembraneExtracellular MatrixHumansMiceNanostructuresProtein BindingRatsSubstrate SpecificityAgrinCell Adhesion Molecules

Identifiers

PMID19055842
PMCPMC2612657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.