ArticleRetrovirology2008
HIV-1 coreceptor usage prediction without multiple alignments: an application of string kernels.
Article in Retrovirology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Encodings and models for antimicrobial peptide classification for multi-resistant pathogens.BioData mining · 2019Review
- HIV coreceptor tropism determination and mutational pattern identification.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Performance of commonly used genotypic assays and comparison with phenotypic assays of HIV-1 coreceptor tropism in acutely HIV-1-infected patients.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2015Article
- Reliable genotypic tropism tests for the major HIV-1 subtypes.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Profile of HIV type 1 coreceptor tropism among Kenyan patients from 2009 to 2010.AIDS research and human retroviruses · 2013Article
- Article
- Hybrid approach for predicting coreceptor used by HIV-1 from its V3 loop amino acid sequence.PloS one · 2013Article
- POPISK: T-cell reactivity prediction using support vector machines and string kernels.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Machine learning on normalized protein sequences.BMC research notes · 2011Article
- Clinical significance of HIV-1 coreceptor usage.Journal of translational medicine · 2011Review
- HIV-1 envelope subregion length variation during disease progression.PLoS pathogens · 2010Article
- Recovery of replication-competent residual HIV-1 from plasma of a patient receiving prolonged, suppressive highly active antiretroviral therapy.Journal of virology · 2010Article
- Co-receptor tropism prediction among 1045 Indian HIV-1 subtype C sequences: Therapeutic implications for India.AIDS research and therapy · 2010Article
- Comparative determination of HIV-1 co-receptor tropism by Enhanced Sensitivity Trofile, gp120 V3-loop RNA and DNA genotyping.Retrovirology · 2010Article
- Comparative analysis of cell culture and prediction algorithms for phenotyping of genetically diverse HIV-1 strains from Cameroon.AIDS research and therapy · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHuman immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects cells by means of ligand-receptor interactions. This lentivirus uses the CD4 receptor in conjunction with a chemokine coreceptor, either CXCR4 or CCR5, to enter a target cell. HIV-1 is characterized by high sequence variability. Nonetheless, within this extensive variability, certain features must be conserved to define functions and phenotypes. The determination of coreceptor usage of HIV-1, from its protein envelope sequence, falls into a well-studied machine learning problem known as classification. The support vector machine (SVM), with string kernels, has proven to be very efficient for dealing with a wide class of classification problems ranging from text categorization to protein homology detection. In this paper, we investigate how the SVM can predict HIV-1 coreceptor usage when it is equipped with an appropriate string kernel.
resultsThree string kernels were compared. Accuracies of 96.35% (CCR5) 94.80% (CXCR4) and 95.15% (CCR5 and CXCR4) were achieved with the SVM equipped with the distant segments kernel on a test set of 1425 examples with a classifier built on a training set of 1425 examples. Our datasets are built with Los Alamos National Laboratory HIV Databases sequences. A web server is available at http://genome.ulaval.ca/hiv-dskernel.
conclusionWe examined string kernels that have been used successfully for protein homology detection and propose a new one that we call the distant segments kernel. We also show how to extract the most relevant features for HIV-1 coreceptor usage. The SVM with the distant segments kernel is currently the best method described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.