Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19055830›Full record

ArticleBMC genetics2008

SNP discovery in swine by reduced representation and high throughput pyrosequencing.

Ralph T Wiedmann, Timothy P L Smith, Dan J Nonneman

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Grapevine powdery mildew resistance and susceptibility loci identified on a high-resolution SNP map.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Development and mapping of SNP assays in allotetraploid cotton.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Sequencing technologies and genome sequencing.Journal of applied genetics · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ralph T WiedmannUSDA, ARS, US Meat Animal Research Center, State Spur 18D, NE 68933-0166, USA. ralph.wiedmann@ars.usda.gov
Timothy P L Smith
Dan J Nonneman
Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRelatively little information is available for sequence variation in the pig. We previously used a combination of short read (25 base pair) high-throughput sequencing and reduced genomic representation to discover > 60,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in cattle, but the current lack of complete genome sequence limits this approach in swine. Longer-read pyrosequencing-based technologies have the potential to overcome this limitation by providing sufficient flanking sequence information for assay design. Swine SNP were discovered in the present study using a reduced representation of 450 base pair (bp) porcine genomic fragments (approximately 4% of the swine genome) prepared from a pool of 26 animals relevant to current pork production, and a GS-FLX instrument producing 240 bp reads.

resultsApproximately 5 million sequence reads were collected and assembled into contigs having an overall observed depth of 7.65-fold coverage. The approximate minor allele frequency was estimated from the number of observations of the alternate alleles. The average coverage at the SNPs was 12.6-fold. This approach identified 115,572 SNPs in 47,830 contigs. Comparison to partial swine genome draft sequence indicated 49,879 SNP (43%) and 22,045 contigs (46%) mapped to a position on a sequenced pig chromosome and the distribution was essentially random. A sample of 176 putative SNPs was examined and 168 (95.5%) were confirmed to have segregating alleles; the correlation of the observed minor allele frequency (MAF) to that predicted from the sequence data was 0.58.

conclusionThe process was an efficient means to identify a large number of porcine SNP having high validation rate to be used in an ongoing international collaboration to produce a highly parallel genotyping assay for swine. By using a conservative approach, a robust group of SNPs were detected with greater confidence and relatively high MAF that should be suitable for genotyping in a wide variety of commercial populations.

Indexed as

AnimalsBreedingCattleChromosomes, MammalianContig MappingDNAGene FrequencyGene LibraryGenotypeMolecular Sequence DataPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReproducibility of ResultsRestriction MappingSequence Analysis, DNASwineDNA

Identifiers

PMID19055830
PMCPMC2612698
OpenAlexW2108497509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.