Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19055808›Full record

ArticleGenetic vaccines and therapy2008

Comparison of electrically mediated and liposome-complexed plasmid DNA delivery to the skin.

Loree C Heller, Mark J Jaroszeski, Domenico Coppola, Richard Heller

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic vaccines and therapy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Electroporation-mediated gene delivery.Advances in genetics · 2015
    Article
  5. Plasmid IL-12 electroporation in melanoma.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2012
    Review
  6. Electro-gene transfer to skin using a noninvasive multielectrode array.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2011
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Loree C HellerCenter for Molecular Delivery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA. lheller@odu.edu
Mark J Jaroszeski
Domenico Coppola
Richard Heller
University of South Florida · USMoffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

Electroporation System for Cutaneous Gene TransferR01EB005441 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI HELLER, RICHARD · 2006 to 2009
$1.3M
IN VIVO DELIVERY OF GENES TO SKINR21DK055588 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI HELLER, RICHARD · 2000 to 2001
$287k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB005441NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK055588
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectroporation is an established technique for enhancing plasmid delivery to many tissues in vivo, including the skin. We have previously demonstrated efficient delivery of plasmid DNA to the skin utilizing a custom-built four-plate electrode. The experiments described here further evaluate cutaneous plasmid delivery using in vivo electroporation. Plasmid expression levels are compared to those after liposome mediated delivery.

methodsEnhanced electrically-mediated delivery, and less extensively, liposome complexed delivery, of a plasmid encoding the reporter luciferase was tested in rodent skin. Expression kinetics and tissue damage were explored as well as testing in a second rodent model.

resultsExperiments confirm that electroporation alone is more effective in enhancing reporter gene expression than plasmid injection alone, plasmid conjugation with liposomes followed by injection, or than the combination of liposomes and electroporation. However, with two time courses of multiple electrically-mediated plasmid deliveries, neither the levels nor duration of transgene expression are significantly increased. Tissue damage may increase following a second treatment, no further damage is observed after a third treatment. When electroporation conditions utilized in a mouse model are tested in thicker rat skin, only higher field strengths or longer pulses were as effective in plasmid delivery.

conclusionElectroporation enhances reporter plasmid delivery to the skin to a greater extent than the liposome conjugation method tested. Multiple deliveries do not necessarily result in higher or longer term expression. In addition, some impact on tissue integrity with respect to surface damage is observed. Pulsing conditions should be optimized for the model and for the expression profile desired.

Identifiers

PMID19055808
PMCPMC2631522
OpenAlexW2147984779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.