Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19055775›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2008

Comparative genomic analysis of carbon and nitrogen assimilation mechanisms in three indigenous bioleaching bacteria: predictions and validations.

Gloria Levicán, Juan A Ugalde, Nicole Ehrenfeld, Alejandro Maass, Pilar Parada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. ECSIT facilitates memory CD8Nature cell biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The smallest space miners: principles of space biomining.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Deciphering the Role of Multiple Thioredoxin Fold Proteins ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Effect of COFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gloria LevicánBiosigma S.A., Loteo Los Libertadores, Lote 106, Colina, Chile. ppaglevican@usach.cl
Juan A Ugalde
Nicole Ehrenfeld
Alejandro Maass
Pilar Parada

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarbon and nitrogen fixation are essential pathways for autotrophic bacteria living in extreme environments. These bacteria can use carbon dioxide directly from the air as their sole carbon source and can use different sources of nitrogen such as ammonia, nitrate, nitrite, or even nitrogen from the air. To have a better understanding of how these processes occur and to determine how we can make them more efficient, a comparative genomic analysis of three bioleaching bacteria isolated from mine sites in Chile was performed. This study demonstrated that there are important differences in the carbon dioxide and nitrogen fixation mechanisms among bioleaching bacteria that coexist in mining environments.

resultsIn this study, we probed that both Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans incorporate CO2 via the Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle; however, the former bacterium has two copies of the Rubisco type I gene whereas the latter has only one copy. In contrast, we demonstrated that Leptospirillum ferriphilum utilizes the reductive tricarboxylic acid cycle for carbon fixation. Although all the species analyzed in our study can incorporate ammonia by an ammonia transporter, we demonstrated that Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans could also assimilate nitrate and nitrite but only Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans could fix nitrogen directly from the air.

conclusionThe current study utilized genomic and molecular evidence to verify carbon and nitrogen fixation mechanisms for three bioleaching bacteria and provided an analysis of the potential regulatory pathways and functional networks that control carbon and nitrogen fixation in these microorganisms.

Indexed as

Comparative Genomic HybridizationAcidithiobacillusAcidithiobacillus thiooxidansCarbonCarbon DioxideChileMiningNitrogenNitrogen FixationCarbonCarbon DioxideNitrogen

Identifiers

PMID19055775
PMCPMC2607301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.