Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19055709›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2008

Assaying the regulatory potential of mammalian conserved non-coding sequences in human cells.

Catia Attanasio, Alexandre Reymond, Richard Humbert, Robert Lyle, Michael S Kuehn, Shane Neph, Peter J Sabo, Jeff Goldy, Molly Weaver, Andrew Haydock and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. What does our genome encode?Genome research · 2012
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Identifying transcriptional cis-regulatory modules in animal genomes.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Catia AttanasioDepartment of Genetic Medicine and Development, University of Geneva Medical School, 1 rue Michel Servet, 1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland. Catia.Attanasio@medecine.unige.ch
Alexandre Reymond
Richard Humbert
Robert Lyle
Michael S Kuehn
Shane Neph
Peter J Sabo
Jeff Goldy
Molly Weaver
Andrew Haydock
Kristin Lee
Michael Dorschner
Emmanouil T Dermitzakis
Stylianos E Antonarakis
John A Stamatoyannopoulos
University of Washington · USUniversity of Geneva · CHWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

Identification of Functional DNA Elements by HSqPCRU01HG003161 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STAMATOYANNOPOULOS, GEORGE · 2003 to 2006
$9.4M
Computational discovery of cis-regulatory sequencesR01GM071923 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STAMATOYANNOPOULOS, JOHN A · 2004 to 2007
$2.2M
Trafficking and Regulation of Drug/Xenobiotic Transporter OATR01GM079123 · NIGMS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI YOU, GUOFENG · 2008 to 2017
$2.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG003161NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG003161NIGMS NIH HHS GM079123NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConserved non-coding sequences in the human genome are approximately tenfold more abundant than known genes, and have been hypothesized to mark the locations of cis-regulatory elements. However, the global contribution of conserved non-coding sequences to the transcriptional regulation of human genes is currently unknown. Deeply conserved elements shared between humans and teleost fish predominantly flank genes active during morphogenesis and are enriched for positive transcriptional regulatory elements. However, such deeply conserved elements account for <1% of the conserved non-coding sequences in the human genome, which are predominantly mammalian.

resultsWe explored the regulatory potential of a large sample of these 'common' conserved non-coding sequences using a variety of classic assays, including chromatin remodeling, and enhancer/repressor and promoter activity. When tested across diverse human model cell types, we find that the fraction of experimentally active conserved non-coding sequences within any given cell type is low (approximately 5%), and that this proportion increases only modestly when considered collectively across cell types.

conclusionsThe results suggest that classic assays of cis-regulatory potential are unlikely to expose the functional potential of the substantial majority of mammalian conserved non-coding sequences in the human genome.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidAnimalsCell LineConserved SequenceEvolution, MolecularGenomeHumansMice

Identifiers

PMID19055709
PMCPMC2646272
OpenAlexW2162630564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.