Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19054740›Full record

ArticleArchaea (Vancouver, B.C.)2008

Conditions for gene disruption by homologous recombination of exogenous DNA into the Sulfolobus solfataricus genome.

Sonja-Verena Albers, Arnold J M Driessen

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archaea (Vancouver, B.C.), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Progress and Challenges in Archaeal Cell Biology.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  7. A Rapid Targeted Gene Inactivation Approach in Sulfolobus islandicus.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Biotechnology of extremely thermophilic archaea.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2018
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Frontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sonja-Verena AlbersDepartment of Microbiology, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute and the Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Kerklaan 30, 9751 NN HAREN, The Netherlands. s.v.albers@rug.nl
Arnold J M Driessen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The construction of directed gene deletion mutants is an essential tool in molecular biology that allows functional studies on the role of genes in their natural environment. For hyperthermophilic archaea, it has been difficult to obtain a reliable system to construct such mutants. However, during the past years, systems have been developed for Thermococcus kodakarensis and two Sulfolobus species, S. acidocaldarius and derivatives of S. solfataricus 98/2. Here we describe an optimization of the method for integration of exogenous DNA into S. solfataricus PBL 2025, an S. solfataricus 98/2 derivative, based on lactose auxotrophy that now allows for routine gene inactivation.

Indexed as

Gene DeletionGenetic TechniquesRecombination, GeneticCulture MediaDNA, ArchaealElectroporationGenome, ArchaealLactoseSelection, GeneticSulfolobus solfataricusCulture MediaDNA, ArchaealLactose

Identifiers

PMID19054740
PMCPMC2685593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.