ArticleAtencion primaria2008
[Profile of the patient with inadequate follow-up and control of cardiovascular risk factors after suffering an acute myocardial infarction].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo draw up a profile of patients with inadequate follow-up and control of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
designCohort study.
settingPrimary care in Albacete, province of Castilla-La Mancha, Spain.
participantsAMI cases who survived at 28 days and recorded in the IBERICAAlbacete register. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: A structured survey of patients, families or family doctors to find out about the follow-up and control of CVRFs (arterial hypertension [AHT], hypercholesterolaemia, diabetes, smoking habits, and obesity), as well as education level, work situation and return to work. Inadequate follow-up is defined as when the recommended visits are not made, and inadequate control, when adequate levels are no obtained or they smoked. A descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate comparative analysis was performed. The association was measured using relative risk (RR), and the population estimation with the 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
resultsThe sample included 21% females, 46% hypertensives, 35% with hypercholesterolaemia, 32% diabetics, 36% obeses, and 39% active smokers, with a mean age of 61 years. There was a 9% loss in follow-up, and 576 patients had a CVRF: 31% with inadequate follow-up (95% CI, 28-36) and 46% with inadequate control (95% CI, 41-51). The profile of a patient with inadequate follow-up was young, unemployed, with university education, smoker, obese and without AHT; that of an inadequately controlled patient was, a smoker, diabetic and unemployed.
conclusionsThere was inadequate follow-up of long term CVRFs in 31% of AMI patients, and 46% with inadequate control, there being characteristics in AMI that identify them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.