Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19053894›Full record

ReviewExpert review of anti-infective therapy2008

Cefepime: a reappraisal in an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance.

Andrea Endimiani, Federico Perez, Robert A Bonomo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of anti-infective therapy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Involvement of theFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model of cefepime to predict its pharmacokinetics in healthy, pediatric and disease populations.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrea EndimianiDepartment of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA. aendimiani@gmail.com
Federico Perez
Robert A Bonomo

Funding

Understanding ceftazidime resistance in SHV B-LactamasesR01AI063517 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BONOMO, ROBERT A. · 2005 to 2023
$4.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI063517NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI063517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cefepime is a 'fourth-generation' cephalosporin with an in vitro extended-spectrum of activity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogens. Cefepime is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe infections, such as pneumonia, uncomplicated and complicated urinary tract infections, skin and soft-tissue infections, intra-abdominal infections and febrile neutropenia. In this article, we provide a critical review of pharmacodynamics, clinical management, pharmacokinetics, metabolism, pharmacodynamic target analyses, clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of cefepime after more than a decade of clinical use.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsCefepimeCephalosporinsChildDrug Resistance, BacterialGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHumansRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefepimeCephalosporins

Identifiers

PMID19053894
PMCPMC2633657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.