ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2008
DNA on a tube: electrostatic contribution to stiffness.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Mechanical properties of DNA-like polymers.Nucleic acids research · 2013Article
- Measuring shape-dependent looping probability of DNA.Biophysical journal · 2013Article
- Torque-induced deformations of charged elastic DNA rods: thin helices, loops, and precursors of DNA supercoiling.Journal of biological physics · 2011Article
- DNA curvature and flexibility in vitro and in vivo.Quarterly reviews of biophysics · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Two simple models are used to estimate the electrostatic contributions to the stiffness of short DNA fragments. The first model views DNA as two strands that are appropriately parametrized and are wrapped helically around a straight cylinder radius equal to the radius of the DNA molecule. The potential energy of the DNA due to phosphate-phosphate electrostatic interactions is evaluated assuming that the charges interact through Debye-Hückel potentials. This potential energy is compared with the potential energy as computed using our second model in which DNA is viewed as two helical strands wrapping around a curved tube whose cross-section is a disk of radius equal to the radius of the DNA. We find that the electrostatic persistence length for B-DNA molecules in the range of 105-130 bp is 125.64 angstroms (37 bp) and 76.05 angstroms (23 bp) at 5 and 10 mM monovalent salt concentration, respectively. If the condensed fraction theta is taken to be 0.715 at 10 mM, then the electrostatic persistence length is 108.28 angstroms (32 bp), while that based on taking into account end effects is 72.87 angstroms (21 bp). At 5 mM monovalent salt, the total persistence length for DNA fragments in this length range is approximately 575.64 angstroms (171 bp), using the best estimate for nonelectrostatic contribution to persistence length. Electrostatic effects thus contribute 21.8% to DNA stiffness at 5 mM for fragments between 105- to 130-bp. In contrast, electrostatics are calculated to make a negligible contribution to the DNA persistence length at physiological monovalent cation concentration. The results are compared with counterion condensation models and experimental data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.