Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19053249›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2008

Structural studies of interactions between cardiac troponin I and actin in regulated thin filament using Förster resonance energy transfer.

Jun Xing, Mathivanan Chinnaraj, Zhihong Zhang, Herbert C Cheung, Wen-Ji Dong

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CaBiophysical journal · 2018
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Ala scanning of the inhibitory region of cardiac troponin I.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2009
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jun XingDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 354294, USA.
Mathivanan Chinnaraj
Zhihong Zhang
Herbert C Cheung
Wen-Ji Dong
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USWashington State University · US

Funding

Kinetics of Cardiac Myofilament ActivationR01HL080186 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DONG, WEN-JI · 2005 to 2013
$3.4M
REGULATORY MECHANISMS OF CARDIAC MUSCLER01HL052508 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI CHEUNG, HERBERT C · 1996 to 2008
$2.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL52508NHLBI NIH HHS HL80186NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL052508NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL080186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Ca(2+)-induced interaction between cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and actin plays a key role in the regulation of cardiac muscle contraction and relaxation. In this report we have investigated changes of this interaction in response to strong cross-bridge formation between myosin S1 and actin and PKA phosphorylation of cTnI within reconstituted thin filament. The interaction was monitored by measuring Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) between the fluorescent donor 5-(iodoacetamidoethyl)aminonaphthalene-1-sulfonic acid (AEDANS) attached to the residues 131, 151, 160 167, 188, and 210 of cTnI and the nonfluorescent acceptor 4-(dimethylamino)phenylazophenyl-4'-maleimide (DABM) attached to cysteine 374 of actin. The FRET distance measurements showed that bound Ca(2+) induced large increases in the distances from actin to the cTnI sites, indicating a Ca(2+)-triggered separation of cTnI from actin. Strongly bound myosin S1 induced additional increases in these distances in the presence of bound Ca(2+). The two ligand-induced increases were independent of each other. These two-step changes in distances provide a direct link of structural changes at the interface between cTnI and actin to the three-state model of thin filament regulation of muscle contraction and relaxation. When cTnC was inactivated through mutations of key residues within the 12-residue Ca(2+)-binding loop, strongly bound S1 alone induced increases in the distances in spite of the fact that the filaments no longer bound regulatory Ca(2+). These results suggest bound Ca(2+) or strongly bound S1 alone can partially activate thin filament, but full activation requires both bound Ca(2+) and strongly bound S1. The distributions of the FRET distances revealed different structural dynamics associated with different regions of cTnI in different biochemical states. The second actin-binding region appears more rigid than the inhibitory/regulatory region. In the Mg(2+) state, the regulatory region appears more flexible than the inhibitory region, and in the Ca(2+) state the inhibitory region becomes more flexible. PKA phosphorylation of cTnI at Ser23 and Ser24 distance from actin to cTnI residue 131 by 2.2-5.2 A in different biochemical states and narrowed the distributions of the distances from actin to the inhibitory and regulatory regions of cTnI. The observed phosphorylation effects are likely due to an intramolecular interaction of the phosphorylated N-terminal segment and the inhibitory region of cTnI.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonActinsAnimalsCattleChickensFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferMiceMyocardiumProtein BindingRatsTroponin IActinsTroponin I

Identifiers

PMID19053249
PMCPMC2599808
OpenAlexW2075824719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.