Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19053073›Full record

ArticleElectrophoresis2008

Ligase detection reaction for the analysis of point mutations using free-solution conjugate electrophoresis in a polymer microfluidic device.

Rondedrick Sinville, Jennifer Coyne, Robert J Meagher, Yu-Wei Cheng, Francis Barany, Annelise Barron, Steven A Soper

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Electrophoresis, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Modular microfluidics for life sciences.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rondedrick SinvilleCenter for BioModular Multi-Scale Microsystems, Department of Chemistry, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
Jennifer Coyne
Robert J Meagher
Yu-Wei Cheng
Francis Barany
Annelise Barron
Steven A Soper
Stanford University · USCornell University · USLouisiana State University · US

Funding

Genotyping Molecular Signatures of CRC using Polymer Microchip-CE and FSCER21CA128671 · NCI · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV A&M COL BATON ROUGE · PI SOPER, STEVEN ALLAN · 2007 to 2008
$339k
NCI NIH HHS R21-1CA128671NCI NIH HHS R21 CA128671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed a new method for the analysis of low abundant point mutations in genomic DNA using a combination of an allele-specific ligase detection reaction (LDR) with free-solution conjugate electrophoresis (FSCE) to generate and analyze the genetic products. FSCE eliminates the need for a polymer sieving matrix by conjugating chemically synthesized polyamide "drag-tags" onto the LDR primers. The additional drag of the charge-neutral drag-tag breaks the linear scaling of the charge-to-friction ratio of DNA and enables size-based separations of DNA in free solution using electrophoresis with no sieving matrix. We successfully demonstrate the conjugation of polyamide drag-tags onto a set of four LDR primers designed to probe the K-ras oncogene for mutations highly associated with colorectal cancer, the simultaneous generation of fluorescently labeled LDR/drag-tag conjugate (LDR-dt) products in a multiplexed, single-tube format with mutant:WT ratios as low as 1:100, respectively, and the single-base, high-resolution separation of all four LDR-dt products. Separations were conducted in free solution with no polymer network using both a commercial capillary array electrophoresis (CAE) system and a PMMA microchip replicated via hot-embossing with only a Tris-based running buffer containing additives to suppress the EOF. Typical analysis times for LDR-dt were 11 min using the CAE system and as low as 85 s for the PMMA microchips. With resolution comparable to traditional gel-based CAE, FSCE along with microchip electrophoresis decreased the separation time by more than a factor of 40.

Indexed as

Point MutationBase SequenceCell Line, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsDNA Mutational AnalysisDNA, NeoplasmDNA PrimersElectrophoresis, CapillaryElectrophoresis, MicrochipGenes, rasGenotypeHumansLigase Chain ReactionPolymethyl MethacrylateDNA, NeoplasmDNA PrimersPolymethyl Methacrylate

Identifiers

PMID19053073
PMCPMC3010182
OpenAlexW2057477753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.