Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19052883›Full record

ReviewJournal of muscle research and cell motility2008

Prostaglandins in muscle regeneration.

Pedro Veliça, Chris M Bunce

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Muscle Injuries Induce a Prostacyclin-PPARγ/PGC1a-FAO Spike That Boosts Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  2. The dose-response effects of arachidonic acid on primary human skeletal myoblasts and myotubes.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Human inflammatory and resolving lipid mediator responses to resistance exercise and ibuprofen treatment.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2013
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pedro VeliçaSchool of Biosciences, The University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK. p.velica@bham.ac.uk
Chris M Bunce
University of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscle regeneration is a tightly orchestrated process where activated satellite cells (myoblasts) respond to external stimuli in order to proliferate, differentiate and fuse to damaged myofibers. Simultaneously, the injured tissue undergoes an inflammatory response and communication between leukocytes and the spectrum of differentiated and undifferentiated muscle cells is essential for proper healing. This communication is mediated by cytokines, growth factors and prostaglandins and dissecting the role of these signaling molecules might be the key to positively manipulate muscle regeneration in the future. This review will focus on the roles of prostaglandins and will consider the potential cost of using non-steroidal inflammatory drugs as popular treatment of muscle injury.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMuscle, SkeletalProstaglandinsRegenerationProstaglandins

Identifiers

PMID19052883
OpenAlexW2074276947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.