ReviewWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2008
[Minimizing perioperative risk - an interdisciplinary effort].
Review in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient-specific surgical outcomes assessment using population-based data analysis for risk model development.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physicians involved in perioperative care have to face new challenges because of the continuing aging of the population and medical progress, which facilitates even more invasive surgery. The risk of surgical procedures is elevated in patients with cardiac co-morbidity necessitating an optimization of both clinical condition and preoperative therapy of these patients. Innovative therapeutic concepts like fast-track surgery, new approaches in coronary revascularisation, and new strategies of anticoagulation require an interdisciplinary treatment of these patients and a strict collaboration of surgeons and anaesthesiologists with the colleagues from other nonsurgical disciplines like internal medicine and cardiology. Physicians should start beforehand the interdisciplinary preparation of surgical patients as out-patients and should continue this approach during the stay in hospital. In this review, we describe the major perioperative cardiac, pulmonary and vascular risks for physicians involved in the treatment of surgical patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.