Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19052326›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR2008

Genes and molecules of lactobacilli supporting probiotic action.

Sarah Lebeer, Jos Vanderleyden, Sigrid C J De Keersmaecker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 437 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
437citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

437 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Contribution ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Engineering the gut microbiome with metal-resistant bacteria could protect Artemia nauplii from cadmium toxicity.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of DietaryVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Comparative Genomics-Based Evaluation ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Lipoteichoic Acid Fraction fromMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article

377 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah LebeerCentre of Microbial and Plant Genetics, K U Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 20, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Jos Vanderleyden
Sigrid C J De Keersmaecker

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactobacilli have been crucial for the production of fermented products for centuries. They are also members of the mutualistic microbiota present in the human gastrointestinal and urogenital tract. Recently, increasing attention has been given to their probiotic, health-promoting capacities. Many human intervention studies demonstrating health effects have been published. However, as not all studies resulted in positive outcomes, scientific interest arose regarding the precise mechanisms of action of probiotics. Many reported mechanistic studies have addressed mainly the host responses, with less attention being focused on the specificities of the bacterial partners, notwithstanding the completion of Lactobacillus genome sequencing projects, and increasing possibilities of genomics-based and dedicated mutant analyses. In this emerging and highly interdisciplinary field, microbiologists are facing the challenge of molecular characterization of probiotic traits. This review addresses the advances in the understanding of the probiotic-host interaction with a focus on the molecular microbiology of lactobacilli. Insight into the molecules and genes involved should contribute to a more judicious application of probiotic lactobacilli and to improved screening of novel potential probiotics.

Indexed as

Genes, BacterialProbioticsAnimalsFood MicrobiologyHumansIntestinesLactobacillus

Identifiers

PMID19052326
PMCPMC2593565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.