Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19052325›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR2008

Comparative genomics and molecular dynamics of DNA repeats in eukaryotes.

Guy-Franck Richard, Alix Kerrest, Bernard Dujon

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 254 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
254citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
33.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

254 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 565 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Technologies for engineering repetitive DNA.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Divergence and conservation of satellite DNA in the loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta): a comparative cytogenomic analysis.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Emergence of satellite DNAs suggests centromeric repositioning as a driver of karyotypic variation of the freshwater darter characines (Apareiodon affinis).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

194 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Guy-Franck RichardInstitut Pasteur, Unité de Génétique Moléculaire des Levures, CNRS, URA2171, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, UFR927, 25 rue du Dr. Roux, F-75015, Paris, France. gfrichar@pasteur.fr
Alix Kerrest
Bernard Dujon
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut Pasteur · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repeated elements can be widely abundant in eukaryotic genomes, composing more than 50% of the human genome, for example. It is possible to classify repeated sequences into two large families, "tandem repeats" and "dispersed repeats." Each of these two families can be itself divided into subfamilies. Dispersed repeats contain transposons, tRNA genes, and gene paralogues, whereas tandem repeats contain gene tandems, ribosomal DNA repeat arrays, and satellite DNA, itself subdivided into satellites, minisatellites, and microsatellites. Remarkably, the molecular mechanisms that create and propagate dispersed and tandem repeats are specific to each class and usually do not overlap. In the present review, we have chosen in the first section to describe the nature and distribution of dispersed and tandem repeats in eukaryotic genomes in the light of complete (or nearly complete) available genome sequences. In the second part, we focus on the molecular mechanisms responsible for the fast evolution of two specific classes of tandem repeats: minisatellites and microsatellites. Given that a growing number of human neurological disorders involve the expansion of a particular class of microsatellites, called trinucleotide repeats, a large part of the recent experimental work on microsatellites has focused on these particular repeats, and thus we also review the current knowledge in this area. Finally, we propose a unified definition for mini- and microsatellites that takes into account their biological properties and try to point out new directions that should be explored in a near future on our road to understanding the genetics of repeated sequences.

Indexed as

Eukaryotic CellsGenomicsAnimalsDNAGenetic SpeciationHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidDNA

Identifiers

PMID19052325
PMCPMC2593564
OpenAlexW2146683382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.