Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19052155›Full record

Trial reportHealth education research2009

Adolescents' impressions of antismoking media literacy education: qualitative results from a randomized controlled trial.

Brian A Primack, Danielle Fine, Christopher K Yang, Dustin Wickett, Susan Zickmund

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health education research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00398190 (Media Literacy to Prevent Adolescent Smoking), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00398190 nacompletednot on this map

Media Literacy to Prevent Adolescent Smoking

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2006 to 2009Enrolled1,211ConditionsSmoking StatusArmsControl, Media Literacy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. School-based programmes for preventing smoking.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Momentary effects of exposure to prosmoking media on college students' future smoking risk.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2012
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Influences of tobacco advertising exposure and conduct problems on smoking behaviors among adolescent males and females.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Media Literacy Interventions: A Meta-Analytic Review.The Journal of communication · 2012
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brian A PrimackDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. bprimack@pitt.edu
Danielle Fine
Christopher K Yang
Dustin Wickett
Susan Zickmund

Funding

Media Literacy to Prevent Adolescent Smoking InitiationK07CA114315 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PRIMACK, BRIAN A. · 2006 to 2010
$766k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA114315NCI NIH HHS K07-CA114315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although media literacy represents an innovative venue for school-based antismoking programming, studies have not systematically compared student impressions of these and traditional programs. This study utilized data from a randomized trial comparing these two types of programs. After each program, students responded to three open-ended questions related to their assigned curriculum. Two coders, blinded to student assignments, independently coded these data. Coders had strong inter-rater agreement (kappa = 0.77). Our primary measures were spontaneously noted overall assessment, enjoyment/interest and the likelihood of changing smoking behavior. Of the 531 participants, 255 (48.0%) were randomized to the intervention (media literacy) group. Intervention participants had more net positive responses [rate ratio (RR) = 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.05, 1.54], more responses rating the program as compelling (RR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.16, 2.29) and fewer responses rating the program as non-compelling (RR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.39, 0.97). However, the intervention group was not more likely to suggest that the curriculum was likely to change behavior positively (RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.30, 1.06). Findings suggest that although media literacy provides a compelling format for the delivery of anti-tobacco programming, integration of components of traditional programming may help media literacy programs achieve maximal efficacy.

Indexed as

Health EducationMass MediaPsychology, AdolescentAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorCurriculumFemaleHumansMaleProgram EvaluationSchool Health ServicesSmoking CessationUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID19052155
PMCPMC2706492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.