Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19052143›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of sports medicine2009

Using electronic/computer interventions to promote physical activity.

B H Marcus, J T Ciccolo, C N Sciamanna

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of sports medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Randomized controlled trial testing an internet physical activity intervention for sedentary adults.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2013
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Benefit of Wearing an Activity Tracker in Sarcoidosis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

B H MarcusDepartment of Community Health and Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University, 121 South Main Street, 8th floor, Providence, Rhode Island 02903, USA. bess_marcus@brown.edu
J T Ciccolo
C N Sciamanna

Funding

Internet Technologies to Increase Exercise BehaviorR01HL069866 · NHLBI · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI MARCUS, BESS HYA · 2003 to 2006
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL069866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The internet has been used as a method to deliver various health interventions (eg, weight management, smoking cessation, increasing physical activity). An electronic search (ie, PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science) for internet-based physical activity interventions among adults yields fewer than 25 studies. Although many have considered physical activity as one element of a multifactorial behavioural intervention, few have focused exclusively on changing sedentary behaviour. Overall, current results are encouraging and it appears that response to an internet-based physical activity intervention is similar to response to other more established, effective interventions. Given that primary care referrals for physical activity are successful in changing sedentary behaviour to some extent, there is an urgent need for investigations into the effect of using an internet-based physical activity programme within the context of primary care. Although no studies that have combined an established internet-based physical activity programme with primary care were found, there is evidence that significant progress would probably be made by providing clinicians with information on internet-based physical activity programmes.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth BehaviorInternetAdolescentAdultAgedClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID19052143
PMCPMC5718350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.