Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19051300›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part A2009

A novel biomimetic polymer scaffold design enhances bone ingrowth.

Chris P Geffre, David S Margolis, John T Ruth, Donald W DeYoung, Brandi C Tellis, John A Szivek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Citrate-based biphasic scaffolds for the repair of large segmental bone defects.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2015
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chris P GeffreDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA. cgeffre@email.arizona.edu
David S Margolis
John T Ruth
Donald W DeYoung
Brandi C Tellis
John A Szivek

Funding

Sensate Scaffolds for Orthopaedic Tissue RepairR01EB000660 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI SZIVEK, JOHN A · 2002 to 2005
$1.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000660NIBIB NIH HHS R01-EB000660
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been recent interest in treating large bone defects with polymer scaffolds because current modalities such as autographs and allographs have limitations. Additionally, polymer scaffolds are utilized in tissue engineering applications to implant and anchor tissues in place, promoting integration with surrounding native tissue. In both applications, rapid and increased bone growth is crucial to the success of the implant. Recent studies have shown that mimicking native bone tissue morphology leads to increased osteoblastic phenotype and more rapid mineralization. The purpose of this study was to compare bone ingrowth into polymer scaffolds created with a biomimetic porous architecture to those with a simple porous design. The biomimetic architecture was designed from the inverse structure of native trabecular bone and manufactured using solid free form fabrication. Histology and muCT analysis demonstrated a 500-600% increase in bone growth into and adjacent to the biomimetic scaffold at five months post-op. This is in agreement with previous studies in which biomimetic approaches accelerated bone formation. It also supports the applicability of polymer scaffolds for the treatment of large tissue defects when implanting tissue-engineering constructs. (c) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2009.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBiomimeticsBone and BonesBone SubstitutesOsteoblastsOsteogenesisPhenotypePolyestersPolymersPorosityTime FactorsTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsTomography, X-Ray ComputedBiocompatible MaterialsBone Substitutespoly(1,4-butylene terephthalate)PolyestersPolymers

Identifiers

PMID19051300
PMCPMC2767470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.