Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19050706›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2009

Combined assessment of EGFR pathway-related molecular markers and prognosis of NSCLC patients.

M I Galleges Ruiz, K Floor, S M Steinberg, K Grünberg, F B J M Thunnissen, J A M Belien, G A Meijer, G J Peters, E F Smit, J A Rodriguez and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Prognostic value ofCancer management and research · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Profiling of phospho-AKT, phospho-mTOR, phospho-MAPK and EGFR in non-small cell lung cancer.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Prognostic and predictive values of pERK1/2 and pAkt-1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2011
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

M I Galleges RuizDepartment of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
K Floor
S M Steinberg
K Grünberg
F B J M Thunnissen
J A M Belien
G A Meijer
G J Peters
E F Smit
J A Rodriguez
G Giaccone
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLData Management (Italy) · ITNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value of the combined assessment of multiple molecular markers related to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Tumour specimens of 178 NSCLC patients were collected and analysed for EGFR and KRAS mutation status by DNA sequencing, and for EGFR copy number by fluorescent in situ hybridisation. Tissue microarrays were generated and used to determine the expression of multiple EGFR pathway-related proteins by immunohistochemistry. We analysed the association between each marker and patient prognosis. Univariate analyses for each clinical variable and each molecular marker were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. From these results, we selected the variables KRAS mutations and expression of cytoplasmic EGFR, granular pERK, nuclear pSTAT3, cytoplasmic E-cadherin and cytoplasmic pCMET to enter into a Cox proportional hazards model, along with stage as the strongest clinical variable related with prognosis. Of the EGFR-related markers evaluated here, the markers EGFR, pERK, pSTAT3, E-cadherin, pCMET and mutations in KRAS were associated with survival when analysed in combination in our patient cohort, with P=0.00015 as the P-value for a test of the additional impact of markers on prognosis, after taking stage into consideration. Confirmation of the impact of these markers in independent studies will be necessary.

Indexed as

CadherinsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungErbB ReceptorsFemaleGene DosageGenes, rasHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMultivariate AnalysisMutationPrognosisSignal TransductionSTAT3 Transcription FactorCadherinsErbB ReceptorsSTAT3 protein, humanSTAT3 Transcription Factor

Identifiers

PMID19050706
PMCPMC2634682
OpenAlexW2041091602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.