Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19050299›Full record

Trial reportJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2008

Comparison of biological activity of human anti-apical membrane antigen-1 antibodies induced by natural infection and vaccination.

Kazutoyo Miura, Hong Zhou, Samuel E Moretz, Ababacar Diouf, Mahamadou A Thera, Amagana Dolo, Ogobara Doumbo, Elissa Malkin, David Diemert, Louis H Miller and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Functional Comparison of Blood-StageFrontiers in immunology · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kazutoyo MiuraMalaria Vaccine Development Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Hong Zhou
Samuel E Moretz
Ababacar Diouf
Mahamadou A Thera
Amagana Dolo
Ogobara Doumbo
Elissa Malkin
David Diemert
Louis H Miller
Gregory E D Mullen
Carole A Long
Malaria Consortium · GBNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Bamako · MLNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

Host Immune Responses to Antigens of Malaria ParasitesZIAAI001020 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI LONG, CAROLE · 2009 to 2025
$13.6M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AI999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccines represent a significant potential means of decreasing global morbidity and mortality due to malaria. Clinical trials in the United States with Plasmodium falciparum Apical Membrane Antigen 1 (AMA1) showed that the vaccine induced biologically active Abs judged by an in vitro parasite growth inhibition assay (GIA). However, the same vaccine in Malian adults did not increase biological activity, although it elevated ELISA titers. Because GIA has been used to evaluate the biological activity of Abs induced by blood stage malarial vaccine candidates, we explored this discrepancy in this study. We affinity purified AMA1-specific Abs from both U.S. vaccinees and nonvaccinated individuals living in a malaria-endemic area of Mali and performed ELISA and GIA. Both AMA1-specifc Abs induced by vaccination (U.S.) and by natural infection (Mali) have comparable biological activity in GIA when the ELISA titer is normalized. However, a fraction of Malians' IgG that did not bind to AMA1 protein (Mali-non-AMA1 IgG) reduced the biological activity of the AMA1 Abs from U.S. vaccinees; in contrast, U.S.-non-AMA1 IgGs did not show a reduction of the biological activity. Further investigation revealed that the reduction was due to malaria-specific IgGs in the Mali-non-AMA1 IgGs. The fact that both U.S.- and Mali-AMA1-specific Abs showed comparable biological activity supports further development of AMA1-based vaccines. However, the reduction of biological activity of AMA1-specific Ab by other malaria-specific IgGs likely explains the limited effect on growth-inhibitory activity of Abs induced by AMA1 vaccination in Malian adults and may complicate efforts to develop a blood stage malaria vaccine.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesHumansImmunity, InnateImmunoglobulin GInfantLongitudinal StudiesMalaria, FalciparumMalaria VaccinesMaliAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, Protozoanapical membrane antigen I, PlasmodiumImmunoglobulin GMalaria VaccinesMembrane ProteinsProtozoan Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19050299
PMCPMC2788747
OpenAlexW2110198295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.