Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19048000›Full record

ReviewNature clinical practice. Nephrology2009

Sickle cell disease and the kidney.

Jon I Scheinman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature clinical practice. Nephrology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Increasing nitric oxide bioavailability fails to improve collateral vessel formation in humanized sickle cell mice.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Pain in sickle cell disease: current and potential translational therapies.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jon I ScheinmanUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Nephrology, Kansas City, KS 66160-7330, USA. jscheinman@kumc.edu
University of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The renal features of sickle cell disease (SCD) include some of the most common reasons for referral to nephrologists, such as hematuria, proteinuria, tubular disturbances and chronic kidney disease. Therapy of these conditions requires specialized knowledge of their distinct pathogenic mechanisms. Painless hematuria is usually benign--unless massive--and can be treated with hydration alone if renal medullary carcinoma has been ruled out. Tubular functional defects, which tend to reduce urinary concentrating capacity, generally require no specific treatment. Proteinuria might indicate the development of chronic sickle cell nephropathy, which can be treated effectively. Measurement of glomerular filtration rate in SCD is problematic, which makes identification and monitoring of chronic kidney disease difficult in patients with SCD. Although managing and predicting the outcomes of chronic kidney disease in the SCD setting is challenging, affected individuals do benefit from transplantation. This Review summarizes the presentation, processes, pathology, modifiers, diagnosis and treatment of the renal effects of SCD.

Indexed as

Renal Insufficiency, ChronicAnemia, Sickle CellHumans

Identifiers

PMID19048000
OpenAlexW1997594483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.