Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19047797›Full record

ArticleFetal diagnosis and therapy2008

Prenatal diagnosis of annular pancreas: reliability of the double bubble sign with periduodenal hyperechogenic band.

Robert Dankovcik, Jan E Jirasek, Eduard Kucera, Jaroslav Feyereisl, Jozef Radonak, Marek Dudas

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase ReportsMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Fetal diagnosis and therapy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Robert DankovcikP.J. Safarik University, Kosice, Slovak Republic. dankovcik@mail.pvt.sk
Jan E Jirasek
Eduard Kucera
Jaroslav Feyereisl
Jozef Radonak
Marek Dudas
Ústav pro Péči o Matku a Dítě · CZChildren's Hospital of Los Angeles · USUniversity of Pavol Jozef Šafárik · SKUniverzitná Nemocnica Louisa Pasteura · SK

Funding

Epithelial dysfunctions in pathogenesis of cleft palateK99DE018459 · NIDCR · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES · PI DUDAS, MAREK · 2007 to 2007
$32k
NIDCR NIH HHS DE018459NIDCR NIH HHS K99 DE018459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the power of prenatal 2-D ultrasound examination in the 2nd trimester as a method of choice for accurate diagnosis of annular pancreas.

methodsCo-incidence of the double bubble sign (often accompanying gastroduodenal dilatation) together with a hyperechogenic band around the duodenum (corresponding with the tissue of annular pancreas) was used as a diagnostic criterion. Findings from postnatal surgery served for verification.

resultsFrom 7,897 screened pregnancies, annular pancreas was proven in the cases where both signs were present, but never without the hyperechogenic band (N(1) = 3, N(2) = 3, p < or = 0.05). Sensitivity and specificity were 100%.

conclusionsMore multicentric studies are required to test this approach. The following diagnostic strategy is reasonable at the present time: when the double bubble sign is discovered, always suspect annular pancreas and look for the second sign: hyperechogenic bands around the duodenum. Also look for known associated anomalies, and vice versa, if any of associated anomalies are noted, also search specifically for the signs of annular pancreas.

Indexed as

AdultDiagnosis, DifferentialDuodenal ObstructionDuodenumFemaleHumansMass ScreeningPancreasPregnancyReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonography, Prenatal

Identifiers

PMID19047797
PMCPMC2814148
OpenAlexW1967268970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.