Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19047625›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2008

Embryo fossilization is a biological process mediated by microbial biofilms.

Elizabeth C Raff, Kaila L Schollaert, David E Nelson, Philip C J Donoghue, Ceri-Wyn Thomas, F Rudolf Turner, Barry D Stein, Xiping Dong, Stefan Bengtson, Therese Huldtgren and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
24.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The early CambrianProceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Elizabeth C RaffDepartment of Biology and Indiana Molecular Biology Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. raff@indiana.edu
Kaila L Schollaert
David E Nelson
Philip C J Donoghue
Ceri-Wyn Thomas
F Rudolf Turner
Barry D Stein
Xiping Dong
Stefan Bengtson
Therese Huldtgren
Marco Stampanoni
Yin Chongyu
Rudolf A Raff
Indiana University Bloomington · USUniversity of Bristol · GBChinese Academy of Geological Sciences · CNInstitute for Biomedical Engineering · CHPeking University · CNStockholm University · SESwedish Museum of Natural History · SEUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fossilized embryos with extraordinary cellular preservation appear in the Late Neoproterozoic and Cambrian, coincident with the appearance of animal body fossils. It has been hypothesized that microbial processes are responsible for preservation and mineralization of organic tissues. However, the actions of microbes in preservation of embryos have not been demonstrated experimentally. Here, we show that bacterial biofilms assemble rapidly in dead marine embryos and form remarkable pseudomorphs in which the bacterial biofilm replaces and exquisitely models details of cellular organization and structure. The experimental model was the decay of cleavage stage embryos similar in size and morphology to fossil embryos. The data show that embryo preservation takes place in 3 distinct steps: (i) blockage of autolysis by reducing or anaerobic conditions, (ii) rapid formation of microbial biofilms that consume the embryo but form a replica that retains cell organization and morphology, and (iii) bacterially catalyzed mineralization. Major bacterial taxa in embryo decay biofilms were identified by using 16S rDNA sequencing. Decay processes were similar in different taphonomic conditions, but the composition of bacterial populations depended on specific conditions. Experimental taphonomy generates preservation states similar to those in fossil embryos. The data show how fossilization of soft tissues in sediments can be mediated by bacterial replacement and mineralization, providing a foundation for experimentally creating biofilms from defined microbial species to model fossilization as a biological process.

Indexed as

BiofilmsBiological EvolutionFossilsAerobiosisAnaerobiosisAnimalsAnthocidarisAutolysisBacteriaDNA, BacterialEmbryo, NonmammalianMicroscopy, ElectronMineralsDNA, BacterialMinerals

Identifiers

PMID19047625
PMCPMC2614766
OpenAlexW2119919946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.