ArticleMolecular pharmacology2009
Discovery and characterization of novel allosteric potentiators of M1 muscarinic receptors reveals multiple modes of activity.
Article in Molecular pharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
76 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cryo-EM reveals an extrahelical allosteric binding site at the MNature communications · 2025Article
- Discovery of VU0467319: an MACS chemical neuroscience · 2025Article
- A golden age of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor modulation in neurological diseases.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2024Review
- Article
- MScience signaling · 2022Article
- Multitargeting nature of muscarinic orthosteric agonists and antagonists.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Review
- The chemical compound 'Heatin' stimulates hypocotyl elongation and interferes with the Arabidopsis NIT1-subfamily of nitrilases.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2021Article
- Translation-Focused Approaches to GPCR Drug Discovery for Cognitive Impairments Associated with Schizophrenia.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2020Review
- The PAR2 inhibitor I-287 selectively targets GαCommunications biology · 2020Article
- Leveraging bias to your advantage.Nature chemical biology · 2020Article
- Biased M1-muscarinic-receptor-mutant mice inform the design of next-generation drugs.Nature chemical biology · 2020Article
- Current Advances in Allosteric Modulation of Muscarinic Receptors.Biomolecules · 2020Review
- New Advances in Targeting the Resolution of Inflammation: Implications for Specialized Pro-Resolving Mediator GPCR Drug Discovery.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2020Review
- Fine Tuning Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Signaling Through Allostery and Bias.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Review
- Biased MScience signaling · 2019Article
- Targeting Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors for the Treatment of Psychiatric and Neurological Disorders.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2019Review
- The neurobiological basis for novel experimental therapeutics in dystonia.Neurobiology of disease · 2019Review
- Allosteric modulation of β-cell MProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- MBiological psychiatry · 2019Article
- Allosteric Modulation of Class A GPCRs: Targets, Agents, and Emerging Concepts.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2019Review
16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Activators of M(1) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) may provide novel treatments for schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease. Unfortunately, the development of M(1)-active compounds has resulted in nonselective activation of the highly related M(2) to M(5) mAChR subtypes, which results in dose-limiting side effects. Using a functional screening approach, we identified several novel ligands that potentiated agonist activation of M(1) with low micromolar potencies and induced 5-fold or greater leftward shifts of the acetylcholine (ACh) concentration-response curve. These ligands did not compete for binding at the ACh binding site, indicating that they modulate receptor activity by binding to allosteric sites. The two most selective compounds, cyclopentyl 1,6-dimethyl-4-(6-nitrobenzo[d][1,3]-dioxol-5-yl)-2-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carboxylate (VU0090157) and (E)-2-(4-ethoxyphenylamino)-N'-((2-hydroxynaphthalen-1-yl)methylene)acetohydrazide (VU0029767), induced progressive shifts in ACh affinity at M(1) that were consistent with their effects in a functional assay, suggesting that the mechanism for enhancement of M(1) activity by these compounds is by increasing agonist affinity. These compounds were strikingly different, however, in their ability to potentiate responses at a mutant M(1) receptor with decreased affinity for ACh and in their ability to affect responses of the allosteric M(1) agonist, 1-[1'-(2-tolyl)-1,4'-bipiperidin-4-yl]-1,3-dihydro-2H-benzimidazol-2-one. Furthermore, these two compounds were distinct in their abilities to potentiate M(1)-mediated activation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis and phospholipase D. The discovery of multiple structurally distinct positive allosteric modulators of M(1) is an exciting advance in establishing the potential of allosteric modulators for selective activation of this receptor. These data also suggest that structurally diverse M(1) potentiators may act by distinct mechanisms and differentially regulate receptor coupling to downstream signaling pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.