ReviewBehavioral neuroscience2008
The state of the reward comparison hypothesis: theoretical comment on Huang and Hsiao (2008).
Review in Behavioral neuroscience, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Converging vulnerability factors for compulsive food and drug use.Neuropharmacology · 2021Review
- Cocaine self-administration punished by intravenous histamine in adolescent and adult rats.Behavioural pharmacology · 2015Article
- Prior access to a sweet is more protective against cocaine self-administration in female rats than in male rats.Physiology & behavior · 2013Article
- Social interaction promotes nicotine self-administration with olfactogustatory cues in adolescent rats.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2011Article
- Individual differences in cocaine conditioned taste aversion are developmentally stable and independent of locomotor effects of cocaine.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2011Article
- Aversive effects of ethanol in adolescent versus adult rats: potential causes and implication for future drinking.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Rats avoid intake of a gustatory cue following pairings with a drug of abuse, such as morphine or cocaine. Despite the well-established rewarding properties of these drugs, the reduction in intake of the taste cue has been interpreted as a conditioned taste aversion for decades. In 1997, I proposed the reward comparison hypothesis suggesting that rats avoided intake of the drug-associated taste cue because the value of the taste cue pales in comparison to the highly rewarding drug of abuse expected in the near future. In this issue of Behavioral Neuroscience, A. C. W. Huang and S. Hsiao challenge the reward comparison hypothesis by showing parallels between amphetamine and LiCl-induced suppression of CS intake. This commentary addresses the current state of the reward comparison hypothesis in the context of the experiments completed by Huang and Hsiao and their new task-dependent drug effects hypothesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.