Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19040567›Full record

ArticleCell proliferation2008

Lineage specific composition of cyclin D-CDK4/CDK6-p27 complexes reveals distinct functions of CDK4, CDK6 and individual D-type cyclins in differentiating cells of embryonic origin.

V Bryja, J Pacherník, J Vondráček, K Souček, L Čajánek, V Horvath, Z Holubcová, P Dvořák, A Hampl

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell proliferation, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Alkaline phosphatase in stem cells.Stem cells international · 2015
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

V BryjaInstitute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Brno, Czech Republic,Institute of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic,Center for Cell Therapy and Tissue Repair, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic,Department of Molecular Embryology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic, andDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
J PacherníkInstitute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Brno, Czech Republic,Institute of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic,Center for Cell Therapy and Tissue Repair, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic,Department of Molecular Embryology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic, andDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
J VondráčekInstitute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Brno, Czech Republic,Institute of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic,Center for Cell Therapy and Tissue Repair, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic,Department of Molecular Embryology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic, andDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
K SoučekInstitute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Brno, Czech Republic,Institute of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic,Center for Cell Therapy and Tissue Repair, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic,Department of Molecular Embryology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic, andDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
L ČajánekInstitute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Brno, Czech Republic,Institute of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic,Center for Cell Therapy and Tissue Repair, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic,Department of Molecular Embryology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic, andDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
V HorvathInstitute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Brno, Czech Republic,Institute of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic,Center for Cell Therapy and Tissue Repair, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic,Department of Molecular Embryology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic, andDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Z HolubcováInstitute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Brno, Czech Republic,Institute of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic,Center for Cell Therapy and Tissue Repair, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic,Department of Molecular Embryology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic, andDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
P DvořákInstitute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Brno, Czech Republic,Institute of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic,Center for Cell Therapy and Tissue Repair, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic,Department of Molecular Embryology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic, andDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
A HamplInstitute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Brno, Czech Republic,Institute of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic,Center for Cell Therapy and Tissue Repair, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic,Department of Molecular Embryology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic, andDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Czech Academy of Sciences · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis article is to study the role of G(1)/S regulators in differentiation of pluripotent embryonic cells. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe established a P19 embryonal carcinoma cell-based experimental system, which profits from two similar differentiation protocols producing endodermal or neuroectodermal lineages. The levels, mutual interactions, activities, and localization of G(1)/S regulators were analysed with respect to growth and differentiation parameters of the cells. RESULTS AND

conclusionsWe demonstrate that proliferation parameters of differentiating cells correlate with the activity and structure of cyclin A/E-CDK2 but not of cyclin D-CDK4/6-p27 complexes. In an exponentially growing P19 cell population, the cyclin D1-CDK4 complex is detected, which is replaced by cyclin D2/3-CDK4/6-p27 complex following density arrest. During endodermal differentiation kinase-inactive cyclin D2/D3-CDK4-p27 complexes are formed. Neural differentiation specifically induces cyclin D1 at the expense of cyclin D3 and results in predominant formation of cyclin D1/D2-CDK4-p27 complexes. Differentiation is accompanied by cytoplasmic accumulation of cyclin Ds and CDK4/6, which in neural cells are associated with neural outgrowths. Most phenomena found here can be reproduced in mouse embryonic stem cells. In summary, our data demonstrate (i) that individual cyclin D isoforms are utilized in cells lineage specifically, (ii) that fundamental difference in the function of CDK4 and CDK6 exists, and (iii) that cyclin D-CDK4/6 complexes function in the cytoplasm of differentiated cells. Our study unravels another level of complexity in G(1)/S transition-regulating machinery in early embryonic cells.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCell LineageAnimalsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCyclin ACyclin DCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p27Cyclin ECyclinsEmbryo, MammalianEmbryonic Stem CellsG1 PhaseHumansCDK4 protein, humanCyclin ACyclin DCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p27Cyclin ECyclins

Identifiers

PMID19040567
PMCPMC2659368
OpenAlexW2081612715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.