Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19039672›Full record

ReviewJournal of muscle research and cell motility2008

Molecular basis of the catch state in molluscan smooth muscles: a catchy challenge.

Stefan Galler

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Skeletal Muscle Fibers Inspired Polymeric Actuator by Assembly of Triblock Polymers.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Passive force enhancement in striated muscle.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2019
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Ordering of myosin II filaments driven by mechanical forces: experiments and theory.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Nonparametric Model of Smooth Muscle Force Production During Electrical Stimulation.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biochemistry of smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase.Archives of biochemistry and biophysics · 2011
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefan GallerDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstrasse 34, 5020, Salzburg, Austria. Stefan.Galler@sbg.ac.at
University of Salzburg · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The catch state (or 'catch') of molluscan smooth muscles is a passive holding state that occurs after cessation of stimulation. During catch, force and, in particular, resistance to stretch are maintained for long time periods with low (or no) energy consumption at basal intracellular free [Ca2+]. The catch state is initiated by Ca2+-stimulated dephosphorylation of the titin-like protein twitchin and is inhibited by cAMP-dependent phosphorylation of twitchin. In addition, catch is pH sensitive, but the reason for this is unknown. According to a traditional model, catch is due to slower cross-bridge cycles where myosin heads remain longer attached to the actin filaments after force generation, possibly caused by a hindered release of ADP from the myosin heads. However, this model was disproved by recent findings which showed that (i) inhibitors of myosin function, such as vanadate, do not affect catch force; (ii) factors which terminate the catch state do not accelerate myosin head detachment kinetics and (iii) a catch-like high resistance to stretch is still inducible when force development is prevented. Thus, catch probably involves passive linkage structures interconnecting the myofilaments (catch linkages). For example twitchin could (i) tie myosin heads to the thin filaments, (ii) mechanically lock them in a stretch resistant state or (iii) interconnect thick and thin filaments directly. However, it is questionable if these mechanisms are sufficient since twitchin seems to be about 15-times less abundant than myosin. Therefore, in addition, interconnections between thick filaments could exist, which could involve e.g. paramyosin or twitchin. Catch could even involve changes in the compliance of thick filaments. The function of myorod, found specifically in catch muscles in equal abundance with myosin, is not known. The suggestion is made here that catch linkages are present already during active contraction either as ratchet-like elements resisting stretch and not opposing shortening or in some kind of 'standby' mode ready to transform suddenly into the working mode by stretches or after Ca2+ removal following cessation of stimulation.

Indexed as

ActinsAnimalsModels, BiologicalMolluscaMuscle ContractionMuscle ProteinsMuscle, SmoothMyosinsPhosphorylationActinsMuscle ProteinsMyosins

Identifiers

PMID19039672
OpenAlexW2017612717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.